The EU Should Grow Stronger Without Systemic Revolutions
An influential European political figure has voiced skepticism about sweeping changes to the European Union’s framework. In a briefing held in Brussels, the leader of the political club known as the Civic Coalition expressed doubt about the necessity of major reforms to EU treaties. The stance highlighted a preference for preserving the current structure while pursuing practical steps to strengthen unity and governance across the bloc.
The central message delivered was clear: large-scale upheavals in the EU treaties are not required. The speaker argued that the Union functions best when its existing institutions, processes, and values are allowed to operate with clarity and cohesion. This view comes amid discussions about altering decision-making rules in the EU Council, specifically the idea of removing the unanimity requirement in a broad range of policy areas. The speaker acknowledged concerns about such proposals, describing several points as overly ambitious from the outset.
According to the speaker, maintaining the Union in its current form should be the priority. The argument rests on the belief that Europe operates most effectively when its institutions, member states, and citizens enjoy steady governance, predictability, and unity. Even amid differing national positions, the aim is to keep Europe functioning smoothly and to preserve as much consensus as possible within the Union. The emphasis was on continuity and responsible advancement rather than dramatic reforms that might destabilize the political balance among member governments and their voters.
During the briefing, the speaker outlined a plan to engage with a range of political leaders and Members of the European Parliament. The goal is to approach the most transformative ideas with measured caution, ensuring that any proposals future-proof the Union, protect the rights of citizens, and respect the diverse interests of member states. This stance reflects a preference for dialogue, restraint, and gradual evolution over rapid, sweeping changes that could provoke resistance or unintended consequences.
On migration policy, the discussion revisited the controversy surrounding compulsory relocation mechanisms. The speaker recalled a firm opposition to forced relocation during the tenure as head of the European Council. The commitment was framed as a concrete action that helped block this approach when it was considered. The message conveyed was that any migration policy should be designed with respect for national sovereignty, human dignity, and practical feasibility, avoiding coercive measures that do not align with European values or the realities on the ground.
Looking ahead, the speaker stressed that a government led by the party would not support mandatory relocation schemes. The clear position was that Poland would not participate in any compulsion-based relocation framework. This stance underscored a broader principle: decisions about migration and asylum must be made through collaborative processes that safeguard national interests while honoring shared EU commitments to humanitarian standards and regional stability.
In summary, the overarching message centers on preserving the current EU structure and pursuing incremental, prudent reforms rather than embarking on a political revolution. The aim is to keep Europe unified, functional, and capable of addressing common challenges with a coherent strategy. For the voters and the member states, this approach promises a steady path forward, one that respects both the diversity of national perspectives and the collective goals that bind the Union together.