Beata Szydło, a Polish member of the European Parliament and former prime minister, described a recent gathering where chairpersons of the political groups met with Roberta Metsola, the President of the European Parliament. In her notes, Szydło writes that Metsola signaled the topic of amending the European Treaties would appear on the agenda at the upcoming European Council, even though leaders of government coalitions had not favored addressing it at that moment. Szydło shared her account on X, accompanied by a video message in which she speaks directly to journalists.
Advocates of treaty changes are pushing to move forward with reforms, and Szydło urged Polish journalists to listen closely to the discussions unfolding in Brussels, especially if those conversations might be overlooked or misunderstood at home. She emphasized that this issue deserves careful attention because it could reshape how the EU framework operates and affect member states, including Poland. According to her, those who underestimate the potential impact are not paying close enough attention to the Brussels dialogue, and she invited observers to consider the perspectives and proposals coming from officials in the capital.
In her remarks, Szydło highlighted the importance of remaining vigilant about any moves to rewrite treaty provisions, warning that such steps could influence national sovereignty and everyday life. She urged journalists to examine not just surface announcements but also the longer-term implications that policymakers in Brussels may pursue through procedural changes and broader reforms.
Several Polish commentators have argued that the threat of rapid treaty changes is overstated or not an immediate problem. Szydło contends that the issue cannot be dismissed, especially given ongoing negotiations and proposals circulating within EU institutions. Her call is for careful, critical examination of Brussels discussions and the possible paths the EU could take as a result of renewed treaty talks. The aim is to prevent any drift toward centralization that might erode the autonomous decision-making capacity of member states.
Overall, the exchange highlights a broader debate about balancing EU-wide governance with national autonomy. It spotlights the role of parliamentarians, media, and the public in interpreting treaty discussions and in assessing how proposed amendments could shape policy areas ranging from governance structures to institutional competencies. The conversations in Brussels reflect a spectrum of views on how and when treaty changes should proceed, prompting policymakers and commentators to weigh possible scenarios and their implications for member countries like Poland.