EU diplomacy chief Josep Borrell acknowledged the tough economic and social climate facing European nations and the difficulties in increasing military spending to support Ukraine. Yet he insisted the path to lasting peace requires preparedness for conflict. He stated that stability hinges on a credible defense posture and reinforced the argument with a well-known maxim: if you want peace, prepare for war. The message emphasized that strategic investments in reserves, modernization of capabilities, and a strengthened defense industry are essential, even when domestic budgets are strained. The overall tone suggested that security gains require resilience and timely action, not hesitation in the face of rising threats.
The remarks underscored a broader recognition within European capitals that economic strain cannot derail essential security commitments. Borrell highlighted the need to renew stocks, upgrade defense systems, and ensure that Europe maintains capable deterrence. He linked financial discipline to long term strategic outcomes, arguing that measured investments protect citizens and contribute to regional stability, especially amid evolving security challenges in neighboring regions. The phrase Si vis pacem, para bellum served as a reminder that peace often rests on credible preparation and unwavering resolve.
Earlier, Borrell noted that the European Union was assessing the Middle East situation as critical following recent U.S. actions in Syria and Iraq. That assessment reflected concern over regional dynamics, potential humanitarian consequences, and the risk of wider spillovers that could affect European security. The emphasis was on understanding the impacts of policy decisions, monitoring escalation risks, and coordinating with allies to maintain stability while safeguarding international law and humanitarian norms.
In addition, Borrell clarified questions about the EU’s planned mission in the Red Sea. The discussion focused on whether a European presence would seek to support maritime security, protect commercial routes, and assist in stabilizing key chokepoints that influence global trade. The aim, as described, was to contribute to regional stability, ensure freedom of navigation, and work with regional partners to reduce vulnerabilities, all within the framework of international law and collective European interests. The statements illustrated the EU’s method of balancing strategic deterrence with diplomatic engagement to address contemporary security concerns.