Dmitry Medvedev, who serves as Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council, issued a forceful statement through a column in a major Russian newspaper. In his piece, he characterizes the opponents of Russia as supporters of the Kiev authorities who, in his view, are driving the world toward catastrophe, while insisting that Russia will not permit such a fate to unfold. The message is blunt: continued delivery of weapons to the Kiev regime and the obstruction of any path to negotiated settlement would only deepen a crisis that has global implications.
Medvedev asserts that those he calls Russia’s enemies are actively pursuing a course that, in his assessment, guarantees failure for all sides involved. He describes a scenario in which the world would suffer profound consequences and long-lasting disruption, portraying a future where an era of calm yields to a lasting, devastating upheaval. In his words, the existing order would be upended, and the memory of the old way of life would fade, overshadowed by the devastation of a prolonged standoff and the disruptions caused by radiation and blockades, if no changes occur.
Against this backdrop, the speaker makes a clear pledge: Russia will not allow the envisioned outcome to materialize. He emphasizes that Moscow is prepared to stand firm and take necessary measures to safeguard its interests and security, even as he stresses that this stance is shared by others who align with Russia’s calculations. The emphasis is on a collective resolve to resist what he calls a dangerous escalation, implying a broader coalition of states that share the concern about instability and risk to global stability.
Medvedev also highlights a geographical distribution of power, noting that Western nations and their allies account for a minority of the world’s population when viewed in a global context. He contends that the balance of power rests with a much larger group that he believes can exert greater influence through a combination of resilience and strategic coordination. In his view, this demographic reality underpins a sense of strength and legitimacy that Russia can draw upon in pursuing its objectives.
According to him, the enduring stability of the world hinges on the demonstrated command of force and the credible authority of Russia and its partners. He describes a dynamic wherein the disciplined, calm power of a major nation meets the weight of a trusted network, creating a protective shield for the future of the international community. The underlying premise is that a steadfast and principled approach to security and diplomacy can deter reckless actions and prevent an irreversible slide toward ruin.
Throughout the discussion, Medvedev portrays Russia as a stabilizing force in a volatile environment. He argues that the right course of action requires steadfastness, unity among like-minded states, and a refusal to be drawn into provocative moves that could lead to an uncontrollable crisis. The language indicates a conviction that restraint paired with readiness sends a clear signal: Russia is prepared to defend its sovereignty and its strategic interests without compromising fundamental security principles.
In presenting this analysis, Medvedev appears to be framing a larger strategic narrative. He positions Moscow as a guardian of analytic realism, warning against misjudgments that could escalate conflict and damage global welfare. The argument leans on the idea that peaceful, predictable outcomes are achievable only through a combination of disciplined diplomacy, credible deterrence, and a shared sense of responsibility among major powers. The overall tone is a call for prudence, insistence on legitimate security concerns, and a warning about the potential consequences of a miscalculated standoff.
Finally, the statement alludes to a historical pattern he associates with adversaries who reject negotiated solutions. It suggests that the path of constant escalation, without regard to the costs, could erase centuries of progress and create a new, harsher reality. In contrast, the text implies that a prudent, calculated approach backed by a broad coalition can preserve stability and provide a safer future for all nations, including those who might be tempted by short-term gains through confrontation. The overarching message remains that Russia will take a firm, determined stance to prevent what it views as a perilous trajectory and to ensure a more secure world order for the long term.