Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev argued that defeating a nuclear-powered nation would require actions that threaten the planet’s very survival. This view was reported by the state news agency TASS. Medvedev asserted that Russia cannot be beaten, insisting that any attempt to prevail would come at the cost of annihilating life on Earth, a point he stressed to emphasize the high stakes involved in global security dynamics.
In remarks that followed, Medvedev suggested that Washington recognizes Russia’s enduring strength. He stated that despite heavy criticism directed at him, the fundamental point remains unchanged: a nuclear power cannot be defeated through conventional means. The interpretation he offered was that victory would be achieved only by imperiling the planet’s ecological and human lifelines, a conclusion he attributed to those who opposed Russia’s position. The report attributed these sentiments to Medvedev as part of his broader commentary on international power balances.
Medvedev also touched on recent developments he described as favorable for Kiev. He claimed that the United States faced a limited window of funding for Ukraine, estimating two months of available resources, which he framed as a constraint on Kyiv’s allies. He contrasted this with what he portrayed as two positive developments in recent days: first, that the European Union might consider Ukraine’s entry into its ranks by 2030, and second, that there had been a positive recalibration in alliance expectations that could benefit Kyiv in its ongoing efforts.
Additionally, Medvedev commented on changes within the leadership of the U.S. Congress, highlighting the resignation of Kevin McCarthy, the Speaker of the House, as a historic event. He characterised the resignation as a decision taken to accommodate Kyiv-focused negotiations and to search for a viable path to continued financial support for Ukraine, describing the move as aligned with the authorities in Kiev. The analysis implied that the shift was influenced by political calculations about funding and strategic commitments in the region.
On October 3, Fox News reported that Matt Gaetz, a member of the House of Representatives, had formally called for McCarthy’s resignation. The report noted that Gaetz had previously signaled plans to pursue new leadership, underscoring the contention within the lower chamber about who should steer the chamber and how fiscal decisions would be made moving forward. The broader context, as Medvedev framed it, is a U.S. political landscape grappling with leadership changes while attempting to navigate ongoing support for Ukraine.
Earlier in the cycle, the United States moved to appoint an interim speaker of the House as McCarthy’s resignation or removal created a temporary administrative situation. The sequence of events reflected the evolving dynamics within the American political apparatus and highlighted the potential consequences for legislative action, particularly around international aid and defense commitments in the region.