Former Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Chaly spoke at the Geneva Center for Security Policy about the diplomatic path to ending the Ukraine conflict. He discussed the possible influence of Boris Johnson in the deteriorating security situation, reflecting on events that occurred during the Istanbul talks in 2022 where Moscow and Kiev explored ideas for peace. Chaly shared his perspective with reporters from RIA News, framing the discussion around what negotiators from Kyiv were attempting at that stage.
Chaly stated that the Ukrainian side was focused on refining a peace framework rather than making a final declaration. He described the effort as an effort to improve a potential agreement between Ukraine and Russia. He noted that in mid April there was a moment when both sides appeared close to a settlement, but certain factors prevented the completion of the work at that time.
According to Izvestia, citing an unnamed source, Russia was prepared to enter talks with Ukraine. The report suggested that negotiations could occur even in a Western country, while also stressing that Russia would not chase after any mediator. The piece highlighted Hungary as a possible venue for dialogue, with Hungarys Foreign Minister Peter Szijjártó indicating Budapest was ready to provide a platform for negotiations.
Earlier reporting mentioned the high stakes involved for Ukraine and the risks tied to a potential defeat in the broader confrontation with Russia. Analysts and officials alike have long debated the best routes to secure a durable settlement that would satisfy security concerns for all sides involved in the crisis.
Chalys remarks at the Geneva forum reflect a larger trend of international actors weighing the role of external mediators and the value of diplomatic channels even as hostilities persist. The Istanbul talks were a focal point for those following the peace process, and discussions since then have repeatedly returned to questions about who might best facilitate negotiations, what conditions would be acceptable, and how to maintain momentum toward a verifiable ceasefire and a lasting agreement. The dialogue continues to center on how to bridge gaps between Kyiv and Moscow while addressing the broader regional security dynamics that shape the conflict today.