Diplomatic Talks on Zaporizhzhia NPP Security Zone Continue, With Cautious Optimism
In Vienna, the permanent representative of the Russian Federation to international organizations, Mikhail Ulyanov, emphasized that while a consensus on a protected zone around the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant remains within reach in theory, there is no basis for overly optimistic forecasts at this moment. He spoke during an interview conducted by the news agency TASS, outlining the present state of play and the challenges ahead.
According to Ulyanov, the path to a workable agreement exists in principle, but practical prospects depend on a careful balance of assurances and real-world guarantees. He noted that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a pivotal role in shaping progress, with Director-General Rafael Grossi actively pursuing conversations with Russia, Ukraine, China, and leading Western nations. This active engagement reflects a shared interest in preventing any escalation and ensuring nuclear safety in the region.
The discussion about a safe zone builds on ongoing assurances from various sides regarding the plant’s safety. Earlier statements highlighted the importance of maintaining stable conditions at Zaporizhzhia NPP and avoiding actions that could heighten risks around the facility. In this context, the IAEA’s involvement is seen as essential to establish verifiable security measures and to monitor the situation on the ground in cooperation with international partners.
On February 20, officials from the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations announced claims about the safety of the Zaporizhzhia NPP, stating that the facility remains secure and that appropriate measures are in place to address potential threats. This declaration underscores the ongoing dialogue about emergency preparedness and risk mitigation, even as other aspects of the security framework are negotiated at the international level.
In the broader framework of the discussions, Grossi has presented new ideas for organizing a security zone around the Zaporizhzhia site. These proposals are part of a larger effort to create a credible and enforceable buffer that can reduce the danger of accidental or intentional damage. The proposals are being considered alongside existing proposals from Russia, Ukraine, and other stakeholders, with a focus on transparency, verification, and practical implementation.
Additionally, statements from Renat Karchaa, who serves as managing director of the Rosenergoatom Concern, indicate that progress has been made regarding the protective infrastructure around the plant. He pointed out that the construction of a shield against bombardment by Ukrainian armed forces at key Zaporizhzhia facilities is nearing completion. While details of these protective measures are frequently disputed in public commentary, the overall aim remains clear: to strengthen resilience at a site that carries significant regional and global importance.
Observers note that the situation continues to hinge on sustained communication among all parties, including Moscow, Kyiv, and international partners. The combined diplomatic and technical efforts seek to reduce the likelihood of incidents near the plant while preserving the option for a formal agreement on a security zone that can be monitored and respected by the involved states. The ongoing negotiations reflect a shared recognition that nuclear safety cannot be left to chance and requires a coordinated international response that is credible and verifiable. [Source: TASS, updates from the IAEA and official statements]