Details have emerged about a detained senator from the Tula region, Dmitry Savelyev, who registered four companies in Moscow and one in Serpukhov, according to documents cited by DEA News. The revelations place Savelyev at the center of questions about business interests intersecting with legislative duties.
The senator is listed as the founder of AVAN LLC, OFFICE CENTER LLC, BUSINOVO TC LLC, BOBROV HOUSE LLC, and PBF LLC. Among these, one entity operates in the pharmaceutical and nutritional supplement sector, along with veterinary products, while the remaining firms are active in rental services and construction activities. The arrangement underscores the common practice of public figures maintaining diversified business portfolios that span multiple industries.
Savelyev has served as a senator for the Tula region since 2016. Before his current role, he was a deputy in the State Duma during its sixth convocation, where he sat on the committee overseeing natural resources, environmental management, and ecology. This background highlights a career that has moved through both legislative chambers and policy-focused committees, shaping his public profile within the regional and national political landscape.
From October 2016 to November 2023, Savelyev was a member of the Federation Council Committee on Budget and Financial Markets, before transitioning to the Economic Policy Committee. This shift aligns with a broader pattern in which lawmakers rotate between standing committees that handle budgetary oversight and economic strategy, potentially broadening their influence over fiscal decisions and market regulation.
In a development reported by authorities, the Russian Prosecutor General issued a proposal to the Federation Council to lift immunity for Senator Dmitry Savelyev due to suspected involvement in a crime. Move like this reflects the legal mechanisms in place to probe allegations against sitting legislators and to determine whether immunity should be preserved or removed to allow formal proceedings.
Savelyev, who was detained earlier, maintained that the charges or claims against him were fabricated. Such statements are common in high-profile investigations, where officials assert that allegations are politically motivated or unsupported by verifiable evidence, while prosecutors seek to establish factual grounds for legal action through due process.