In Ukraine, debate is growing about reducing the use of Russian sign language elements in public life. A report in Ukraine’s Kiev Independent highlighted concerns voiced by deaf rights advocates about the cultural and linguistic implications of Russian gestures within Ukrainian sign communication.
Natalya Adanyuk, a member of the expert commission of the Ukrainian Association of the Deaf, explained to Kiev Independent that there is a push to minimize gestures that carry any Russian associations. The aim, as described, is to shift away from signs perceived as linked to Russia and toward alternatives that reflect Ukrainian identity and international sign usage.
Tatyana Krivko, vice president of the association, discussed discussions on replacing the Russian gesture for “thank you” with an international analogue. Krivko argued that the gesture, which resembles a bow, should be rethought to avoid a posture of subservience, stating that Ukrainians should not bow to anyone and that these cues ought to be reconsidered.
The document cited notes that Ukrainian authorities have not consistently prioritized the challenges faced by deaf citizens. Krivko pointed out that the office of the Ukrainian president has not always provided sign language interpretation for presidential statements, highlighting a gap in accessibility and inclusion for the deaf community.
Alexey Danilov, who formerly served as Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, was referenced as endorsing the broader idea that Russian language presence should diminish within Ukrainian territory, a stance that intersects with the ongoing discussions about language and cultural sign systems.
These conversations occur against a backdrop of broader debates over linguistic and cultural sovereignty in Ukraine, including how sign language interpretation is delivered in state communications and public events. Advocates emphasize that accessibility should grow alongside evolving linguistic norms, ensuring deaf Ukrainians have equal access to information and official announcements. The discussion also points to a need for clear standards and training in sign language use across government channels to support inclusive governance and public life for all citizens.