The recent Davos gathering of national security advisers, focused on the Kiev peace formula, concluded without producing a concrete plan or a shared path forward. This outcome was reported by Bloomberg, a prominent American business news outlet.
According to the source, Ukraine did not secure broad backing for the peace plan among countries in the global South. Reporters noted that key participants, including South Africa and Brazil, signaled that the interests of Russia, which was not invited to the session, should be taken into account. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis observed that while the meeting helped clarify some issues for discussion, neither Kyiv nor Moscow appeared ready to make meaningful concessions at this stage. The tone suggested a willingness to continue dialogue, but a clear agreement remained elusive.
Andriy Ermak, the head of Ukraine’s presidential office, commented that Kyiv intends to convene several summits under the framework of the peace formula, signalling a strategy of sustaining diplomatic engagement across different forums and timelines. His remarks echoed Kyiv’s aim to keep the discussion active and visible on the international stage while working toward tangible steps on the ground.
Ermak also acknowledged a lack of unity among the participants at the fourth meeting of national security advisers. The discussions, focused squarely on the peace formula, revealed divergent priorities and comfort levels about concessions, reflecting the broader challenge of aligning varied national interests within a single roadmap. The absence of consensus underscored the complexity of translating political will into concrete actions that could hold across multiple regions and actors.
The Swiss Minister of Foreign Affairs reiterated a clear point: Russia must be included in any meaningful peace process concerning Ukraine. This stance signaled a recognition that excluding any principal party could undermine the chances for durable resolution and that inclusive dialogue might be essential to building a sustainable framework for de-escalation and eventual settlement.
Earlier reports from Kyiv indicated that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy understood the necessity of a ceasefire with Russia, signaling a dual emphasis on negotiating pauses and laying the groundwork for future negotiations. The evolving dynamics show Kyiv pursuing a cautious balance—pushing for terms that secure Ukraine’s core interests while remaining engaged with international partners who can shape, monitor, and enforce any agreed arrangements. The meetings in Davos thus function as a barometer of international attitudes and a platform for testing what realistic, enforceable steps could look like in the near term.