In Crevillent, tensions within the local government have come to a head around the resignation of Josep Candela, who had served as councilor responsible for Citizen Safety and Fiestas and who was associated with the PSOE-led coalition. The minutes from last Tuesday showed a clear path for Candela’s exit: either joining the mixed group or accepting that the mayor would revoke his powers. Observers interpreted this as the only viable exit route to avoid a deadlock in a council that already relied on a fragile triple alliance among Compromís, the PSOE, and l’Esquerra for governance. The city hall’s narrative makes it plain that the political arrangement in Crevillent rests on a three-party balance rather than on any single bloc taking unilateral control. The situation underscores how the Left’s ability to govern hinges on a delicate coalition rather than a majority by any one party.
Members of the Socialist faction expressed frustration upon learning the final resolution of the Candela matter through the press, only after Candela’s resignation had been publicly announced. During a press conference, Candela himself cited his intention to align with his political project within the coalition, a move he planned to formalize in a meeting with the city council and in cooperation with l’Esquerra and Esquerra Unida. The executive committee recalled that Candela’s presence in the three-way arrangement had been pivotal for the city’s current trajectory, emphasizing that the electoral gains of the Socialist candidacy created the political moment that allowed Crevillent to move toward a progressive government. Without those gains, the argument goes, there would not have been an election or a new governing coalition in place. A public statement maintained that Candela’s decision to resign was a decisive element in maintaining the coalition’s forward momentum and that his departure from the council would serve the broader aim of political stability in the town.
“Renegade”
Despite the work accomplished by the council during Candela’s tenure, the narrative around his political fate continues to be framed as a consequence of a broader pact governing dissents within national and regional politics. Some stakeholders stress that the current predicament should not be read as a personal attack but as a systemic response to the evolving classifications of defectors within Spain’s Institutional Stability Pact. This pact, which has drawn coverage from many national parties, also touches on the status of political actors who shift allegiance and how such moves are treated in terms of public accountability. The discourse notes that the pact has been referenced by a wide spectrum of parties, including Compromís and Esquerra Republica, highlighting how political cohesion is seen as essential to institutional credibility.
Socialist spokespeople explained that the deportation notion was never a simple matter of party discipline. They asserted that the decision to revoke Candela’s council responsibilities or to push for his resignation was presented clearly to the government partners in Crevillent. The executive emphasized that there was no unanimity at the outset, but the consensus that emerged pointed toward a path where Candela would step away from the council or risk loss of his powers within the municipal cabinet. In their view, Crevillent’s PSOE could not and would not govern through asylum-seeking arrangements, a stance they describe as a firm position against defections that would destabilize the town’s governance. The remarks also drew a parallel to broader tensions within the Alicante Provincial Assembly, suggesting that the region has faced similar criticisms from other political forces about how defections are managed and perceived.
“The most reasonable solution”
From the Socialist perspective, the preferred solution has consistently been to preserve municipal stability and to shield the council from destabilizing political storms. Candela’s decision to resign, as described by party officials, is portrayed as the most logical course of action to prevent a crisis in Crevillent’s governance. They argue that, if Candela had refused to step down voluntarily, the mayor would have been compelled to revoke his powers to preserve the functioning of the council. This approach, they say, demonstrates a commitment to responsible governance and an awareness of how sudden changes could ripple through all levels of municipal administration. The coalition’s supporters contend that Candela’s resignation was a prudent move that safeguarded the achievements of the past four years rather than opening a door to fracturing the administration.
The Socialist group, identified with the Governa del Canvi coalition, maintains that no single party, nor any individual component of the eleven-member alliance, owns the strategizing power or the credit for the administration’s results. They emphasize that governance in Crevillent has been a shared responsibility, with decisions made collectively and without encroaching on the broader interests of the coalition. This stance, they say, reinforces the idea that the coalition remains a functioning, unified entity capable of delivering policy outcomes that benefit residents across the town.
In a closing note, party spokespeople observed that public statements during plenary sessions should not be interpreted as personal attacks. They stressed that a unified municipal team must be mindful of the people’s expectations and the need to maintain stability through open, constructive dialogue. They reiterated that the stability of the local government matters most and warned that allowing unresolved tensions to linger could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations.
The mayor and the PSOE’s spokesperson in the plenary session in Crevillent were cited as emblematic figures in the ongoing discussions around governance, responsibility, and public accountability. The episode, viewed by many as a test of Crevillent’s political maturity, continues to be analyzed by observers who see the resolution as a necessary step toward predictable governance and policy continuity for residents across the municipality. The dialogue remains focused on ensuring that the city can move forward with a practical, forward-looking agenda rather than being caught in perpetual political strife. [Fuente: prensa local]
“Disrespect”
The Socialist grouping argues that the press handling of Candela’s resignation has created a sense of disrespect toward the municipal group and the broader Socialist movement within Crevillent. They suggest that the circumstances, once known, should have been discussed directly within the government table rather than through external channels. The group contends that stakeholders deserved a transparent briefing that acknowledged the complexities of the situation rather than a portrayal that could be interpreted as a personal slight toward the party and its local leadership. The parties emphasize that a respectful, professional process is essential to maintaining trust within the council and with the citizens who rely on their elected officials to act in a stable, predictable manner. They caution that failure to address these concerns adequately could leave a lasting impression of mismanagement and eroded confidence within the municipal administration.
Ultimately, the Socialist bloc reiterates that municipal stability remains the overarching objective. They acknowledge that if the underlying tensions are not resolved, they may set an undesirable precedent for the future. The focus remains on ensuring continuity of services, safeguarding the integrity of the council, and upholding the electorate’s trust in Crevillent’s government as it moves forward with its agenda for progress and community well-being.