In the latest timetable, the court allocates the first two hearing days to revisit earlier questions, with sessions set for March 21 and 22. Testimony by the fifteen defendants is planned to begin on April 9, resuming after the Easter break. The schedule underscores a paced approach where earlier questions are revisited before moving to new testimony, a pattern often seen in long-running cases where fact-finding unfolds over several weeks.
The implication is that a fourth-part motion requesting defendants to testify at the end of the trial remains unresolved. The same approach has been noted in the case involving the former Minister of Labor. Projections suggest weekly sessions from Tuesday through Thursday, creating a rhythm that aims to complete defendant testimony by April 18, while the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office would begin its examination on April 10. This staggered cadence is designed to maintain momentum while allowing space for legal arguments and procedural steps between sessions.
Within the Valencia Court’s Fourth Division, led by Commissioner Villarejo, discussions around key witnesses and testimony have extended into May. The judge’s commentary indicates that statements were concluded around May 14, reflecting how fluid calendars can be in complex proceedings. Even with this progression, the court recognizes that schedules are subject to change based on emerging developments and logistical considerations in the courtroom.
New information released to the parties indicates that three judges will preside over the Erial case, with reserved time in June and July to accommodate developments tied to recent hearings. The announcement notes that additions to the calendar may occur in response to events at the proceedings. If a defense attorney must replace counsel, delays could occur, impacting the planned timeline and potentially shifting subsequent sessions. Such contingencies are common in high-profile cases where legal representation and tactical decisions evolve as the record grows.
Overall, the plan reflects a structured but flexible approach: begin with clarifying questions, move through witness testimony in a staged sequence, and maintain a cadence that supports thorough examination while leaving room for procedural adjustments. Observers often note that calendars like this balance the need for a complete evidentiary record with the practical realities of courtroom administration. The court remains attentive to developments and prepared to adjust the timetable to ensure a fair, orderly process for all parties involved. [Citation: Valencia Court docket and official notices, 2025]