Constitutional reset debate and MPs’ Sejm participation in Poland

No time to read?
Get a summary

Prof. Przemysław Czarnek commented on Radio Wnet about Krzysztof Bosak’s idea of a constitutional reset, suggesting it would resemble a roundtable scenario. He expressed doubt that the Civic Platform (PO) would participate in talks with the Confederation and stated his willingness to engage with the Confederation instead.

Should full-fledged MPs be forcibly brought into the Sejm?

In response to questions about MPs Kamiński and Wąsik attending Sejm debates, the PiS deputy reaffirmed that their mandates have not expired and that they retain full rights to participate in Sejm proceedings.

He asserted that they possess not only the right but also the obligation to fulfill their mandates.

There was also emphasis that the PiS faction would not forcibly introduce Kamiński and Wąsik into the Sejm.

He remarked that forcing these MPs into sessions would be perceived as a return to authoritarian methods, contrasting it with the idea that both gentlemen have every right to take part in Sejm work. The deputy highlighted that Kamiński received 44,000 votes, underscoring the legitimacy of their representation.

According to him, the current constitutional framework in Poland is being sidestepped by some actors, and there is a perception that the state’s constitutional order is not being observed by those in power.

In this context, the discussion touched on concerns about the capture of Kamiński and Wąsik, and a broader debate about rule of law versus political expediency.

Remarks followed that those involved should be careful with language; insults and accusations were described as unhelpful, while there was insistence on adherence to the law.

“I do not believe the Platform can sit at our table”

The interview also addressed the proposal for a constitutional reset announced on January 12 by Deputy Chairman of the Sejm Krzysztof Bosak of the Confederation. Bosak urged all political forces to come together to discuss restoring unity within the state, describing the ongoing political conflict as a deep constitutional crisis Poland had faced for years.

On this point, Czarnek characterized the idea as a legitimate option but noted it would require compliance with existing legal frameworks. He indicated that a roundtable would have to focus on regulatory changes that could resolve the situation and revert governance toward a law-abiding state.

He stated that Bosak should first persuade his coalition partners to comply with the law before any reset could be realistically considered.

In his view, following the constitution and the law would make a reset possible.

He expressed personal openness to dialogue with the Confederacy but indicated skepticism about the Platform’s willingness to engage constructively. He asserted that he would be ready to sit at the table with the Confederation and to speak openly, reiterating his commitment to dialogue.

He added that he would welcome a future where the parties chose to discuss common reforms and cooperate within the bounds of legality.

Constitutional reset?

Bosak’s call to all parliamentary forces to convene and discuss a legal path to solving the crisis involved exploring amendments to the Constitution and other lawful mechanisms that would be endorsed by the President and consistent with constitutional norms. He described these proposals as a framework for leaving the current impasse through broadly accepted amendments, welcoming normal scrutiny and debate from all sides.

According to Bosak, if there were disagreements, each side should present its own proposals rather than resorting to coercion or overlooking judicial rulings. He warned that such forceful measures would not restore the rule of law in Poland.

The conversation emphasized the need for lawful processes and the preservation of constitutional order as the foundation for any effective resolution to the political crisis.

There was a sense that negotiations, if pursued, should be anchored in legal compliance and respect for judicial decisions to avoid undermining Poland’s democratic framework.

In closing, the discussion reflected a shared concern about maintaining the integrity of Poland’s constitutional system while seeking practical pathways to restore unity and stability in state governance.

(Source: wPolityce)

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Authorities claim major operation against Al Shabaab in Galmudug

Next Article

Revealing Moments: Oleg Taktarov on Jealousy, Craft, and Career Moves