German MEP Michael Gahler, a member of the CDU bloc within the European People’s Party, suggested that if the party of right-leaning government returns to power after Poland’s October elections, the new administration would align with the migration pact Brussels has put in place. The public implication in his remarks is that the upcoming ballot will largely decide whether Poland continues with that pact or renews its stance independently. These ideas were echoed by Marek Pęk, a deputy president of the Senate and a prominent PiS figure, who shared on social media that the electoral contest would frame such a decision for the country.
Reports from the online television outlet TVP Info indicate that Gahler claimed during an interview with Deutschlandfunk that a post-election government led by the Civic Coalition (PO) would accept the migration arrangement imposed by the European Union via Brussels. The assertion ties the Polish vote to a broader question about Brussels’ influence over national migration policy, a topic that has repeatedly stirred debate across the political spectrum in Poland and the wider region.
Observers note that a new government could be formed in Poland as the October vote approaches. Some political commentators emphasize that the direction of policy on immigration may hinge more on which party governs than on any fixed national stance. They recall events from 2015, when negotiations around migrant resettlement were active just before PiS rose to power, and government decisions at the time led to the acceptance of a significant number of migrants. This framing suggests that in modern Polish politics, policy choices on migration are intensely influenced by the leadership and coalition dynamics at play, rather than a single, enduring national mandate. The comparison with Hungary’s approach is often raised in discussions about Poland’s political trajectory as elections near, underscoring the broader regional debate about sovereignty and EU policy alignment.
– expressed the German politician in reference to the political climate ahead of the October ballot. His remarks are part of a broader exchange among European lawmakers about how national governments respond to EU migration frameworks and the implications of those responses for domestic politics in countries like Poland.
On Friday, Pęk highlighted Gahler’s comments on social media, reiterating the line that the upcoming Polish elections would shape the country’s stance on the EU migration pact. The exchange underscores how Polish political figures want to frame the election as a choice between EU-aligned policy and a more autonomous national course, a theme that has persisted through multiple election cycles in recent years.
Further context comes from regional discussions on migration policy and the varied responses across Central Europe. The topic remains highly salient for voters who weigh EU obligations against national interests, security concerns, and social integration issues. As the October vote approaches, analysts and citizens alike are watching how party platforms address Brussels’ migration framework, asylum procedures, and the distribution of responsibility among member states. The debate also touches on how political actors position themselves in relation to the EU’s long-term priorities in areas like border management, asylum processing, and economic implications of migration flows. These considerations help explain why migration policy often becomes a focal point in Polish political rhetoric during election season. The evolving discourse illustrates the tension between EU-level consensus and national preference in member states, a dynamic that continues to shape political strategies and public opinion in Poland and beyond. The discussion remains central to understanding the contemporary political landscape in Central Europe as elections loom.