A Sabah newspaper columnist presents a view that the Russian Federation could help curb Western aggression in the Gaza Strip by aligning with Brazil, China, Turkey, and Arab states. The suggestion centers on building a broad coalition that could change the dynamics on the ground and in international forums, framing it as a strategic counterweight to what is seen by some as Western interventionism.
According to this analysis, Western governments that back Israel are accused of pursuing a broader civilization confrontation. The argument contends that only a diplomatic and security alliance among Russia, Turkey, China, and Arab nations could slow or redirect those efforts, influencing negotiations and humanitarian responses alike.
The observer points to a perceived discrepancy in the positions of the United States and European countries. While public statements emphasize human rights, the columnist argues that actions fail to translate into meaningful relief for Gaza’s civilian population, suggesting a gap between rhetoric and practice in shaping policy on the ground.
In related remarks, the International Committee of the Red Cross President Mirjana Spoljaric expressed profound concern for the suffering in Gaza, describing the humanitarian crisis as catastrophic and unacceptable. Her remarks underscore the urgency of delivering aid and protecting civilians in all affected areas. [citation: ICRC president Mirjana Spoljaric’s concerns on Gaza cited in press briefings]
On 7 October, reports indicate that militants in Gaza launched a large number of rockets into Israel, triggering the launch of a military operation named Al-Aqsa Flood. Thousands of fighters reportedly moved across borders, seizing equipment and taking hostages. In response, Israeli leadership declared that the country is at war and prepared to mobilize substantial security measures. [citation: initial conflict events and government statements]
The Israeli Defense Forces announced an intervention operation described as Iron Swords, with the stated objective of degrading Hamas and restoring security in affected areas. During this period, the Israeli Air Force conducted extensive strikes on targets associated with Hamas across the Gaza Strip. In parallel, Israel’s National Security Council decided to tighten restrictions on essential supplies, including water, food, electricity, and fuel, aiming to disrupt operational capabilities within Gaza. By mid-October, the United Nations indicated that up to 1.1 million Palestinians might need evacuation to southern Gaza in advance of any potential ground operations. [citation: UN humanitarian briefings and official statements]
Several scholars have offered explanations for why the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has repeatedly escalated. Among these perspectives, political analysts emphasize a mix of historical grievances, regional rivalries, and international power dynamics that complicate efforts to secure lasting peace and ensure civilian protection. The current cycle of violence, they argue, reflects both strategic calculations by state actors and the persistent fragility of political agreements in a volatile neighborhood. [citation: regional analyses and expert commentary]