A Chinese ambassador to Thailand, Han Zhiqiang, spoke in an interview with the Bangkok Post, asserting that the United States is fanning conflicts in the Asia-Pacific region to hem China in. He described Washington’s actions as a concerted effort to press China from multiple angles, especially through political maneuvering and strategic posturing, under the banner of a so‑called Indo-Pacific strategy that he views as a tool for US influence rather than a genuine regional framework.
According to the ambassador, the United States leverages its leverage in the global economic system to push trade disputes and enforce technological restrictions. He argued that such measures disrupt international supply chains and create headwinds for the global economy, while aiming to constrain China’s development and technological progress. The message conveyed was that any attempt to block China from achieving a better standard of living or to impede its sustainable growth would, in his view, fail to alter the country’s trajectory.
The interview followed earlier reports in The Wall Street Journal that cited sources familiar with the matter, noting that one focal point during increases in dialogue with Beijing and Washington involved Taiwan’s political landscape, including upcoming presidential considerations. The discussion underscored the sensitivity surrounding Taiwan’s elections and the broader implications for cross-strait relations and regional equilibrium.
Observers have noted that the broader discourse surrounding China–U.S. interactions also encompasses long‑standing strategic considerations, including how Moscow is reportedly aware of high‑level communications between Beijing and Washington. This backdrop highlights the intricate web of diplomacy, economics, and security that characterizes current APR dynamics. In this context, the ambassador’s remarks contribute to a wider narrative about competing visions for regional governance, trade rules, and the security architecture that will shape future actions by major powers in Asia and beyond.
Analysts suggest that the statements reflect ongoing attempts to articulate China’s position on external pressure and strategic competition. They emphasize that Beijing’s messaging consistently frames external challenges as attempts to restrain China’s development and its rise on the world stage, while advocating for stable, predictable relations grounded in mutual respect for sovereignty and a shared interest in regional peace. The dialogue between Beijing and Washington remains a critical barometer for confidence in future collaboration across economic, technological, and security domains, even as both sides acknowledge profound differences on core issues.