Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov declined to reveal the details of what he and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed in the closed portion of their September 28 meeting. The exchange was summarized as part of a program about the Kremlin’s activities, with the relevant excerpt published for public view. Reports indicate that the interview began with visible camera presence and widespread attention, while questions about the second, non-public segment of the meeting were left unanswered by Kadyrov.
During the interview, a reporter from a major Russian television network noted that filming occurred primarily during the first segment, and that many viewers had watched video records of those portions. When pressed about the private portion of the dialogue, the Kremlin-aligned official stated that the closed nature of that segment meant it could not be shared, adding that the conversations were candid and that Putin offered support on a range of issues, as has been typical in their interactions. In his framing, Kadyrov described his relationship with the nation’s top leader as one of steadfast backing and open, direct communication, emphasizing his role as a loyal ally who values transparency within the limits of state protocol.
Further remarks circulated during the coverage involved questions about Kadyrov’s health. A television correspondent suggested rumors about a possible decline in well-being, but the Chechen head dismissed these claims as untrustworthy, pointing to attempts by adversaries to sow doubt. He urged observers to rely on verified information and to view reports through a critical lens, noting that misinformation often accompanies high-profile political events and regional leadership.
On the day in question, the two leaders held a working discussion at the Kremlin. While public summaries highlighted several topics, observers noted that the dialogue also touched on the construction of a mosque in Moscow’s Yuzhnoye Butovo district, signaling ongoing engagement with regional religious and cultural projects that reflect broader policy directions. Statements from the Chechen leadership framed the talks as productive, with emphasis on concrete, on-the-ground outcomes that align with national priorities and regional development goals.
Additionally, the interaction was framed as a gesture of solidarity with forces that operate in Ukraine, with public messages of best wishes directed toward those involved in the ongoing operation there. This moment underscored the continuity of political messaging that ties regional leadership to national security interests and the broader objectives of the state’s foreign and defense policy, as reflected in official communications and subsequent public narratives.