In a session of the Valencian Cortes, a cross-party stance emerged as parties aligned with PP and Vox supported a motion urging the Consell to implement subsidies that would preserve, support, and regulate bullfighting celebrations across municipalities and regions. The proposal framed this tradition as a core element of Valencian identity, with the PPCV spokesperson Paqui Bartual presenting the plan as a vital facet of culture and heritage that deserves formal backing.
The Education and Culture Commission heard the proposal, with the mayor of Xirivella backing the measure as it was debated. Proponents argued that subsidies could channel resources toward activities that sustain regional customs rather than suppress them. They described these celebrations as cultural landmarks, embedded in the historical fabric of Valencia, and suggested that public support would help ensure events occur under safe, well-regulated conditions.
On the other side of the debate, Vox emphasized that the bull is not merely a cultural symbol but also an artistic and economic engine for the region. They argued that a strong regulatory framework could harmonize cultural value with oversight that protects participants and audiences alike, contributing to tourism, local economies, and social cohesion.
Opposition groups, PSPV and Compromís, voted against the proposal. The PSPV criticized routing aid through a foundation in Madrid rather than distributing funds directly to Valencian municipal councils or local clubs responsible for bull-related events. The socialist spokesperson in the commission voiced concerns and the unease expressed by federations and clubs involved in bous al carrer across the Valencian Community about the direct subsidy route.
Compromís deputy Vero Ruiz raised questions about how the budgeting was allocated within the organization of bullfighting events. She highlighted two separate allocations: 300,000 euros earmarked for the foundation and 1.4 million euros designated for competitive participation and other cultural activities. The deputy contended that these financial priorities appeared to soften essential public services such as health emergencies, fire prevention, and employment policies, while continuing to press for more funding in favor of bull-related activities.