Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton comments on the Hamas-Israel ceasefire and its implications
John Bolton, who previously served as the United States National Security Advisor, argues that the agreement to temporarily suspend hostilities between Hamas and Israel works against Israel’s strategic interests. He suggests that the pause diverts attention from Israel’s stated objective to neutralize Hamas and presses the concern that the agreement alters the focus toward the fate of hostages and aid to civilians in Gaza.
Bolton characterizes Hamas as engaging in a form of psychological warfare aimed at both Israeli and American audiences. He asserts that the group seeks to shift Israel’s priorities away from its long-term objective of countering Hamas and toward the immediate humanitarian and hostage-related issues. According to him, Hamas may try to transform a temporary ceasefire into a lasting norm that restrains Israel’s response to the threat posed by the organization.
He warns that while Hamas might not succeed in changing the situation overnight, its strategy includes transferring most of the burden and responsibility to Israeli forces, thereby undermining morale and resolve within the Israeli military. Bolton stresses that such a shift could, in his view, create a dangerous precedent that weakens Israel’s legitimate right to eliminate Hamas as a security threat and could be seen as a victory for terrorist groups.
In the broader context of the conflict, Hamas launched a substantial rocket offensive in early October, marking the initiation of a violent operation that the group named Al-Aqsa Flood. The assault involved thousands of militants crossing into Israeli territory, seizing equipment, and taking a large number of people captive. Israel responded with a large-scale operation in Gaza, aiming to dismantle Hamas, which included a blockade and extensive bombardment that forced mass displacement and raised grave humanitarian concerns across the region.
On November 22, an agreement was reached between Israel and Hamas regarding the release of hostages held in Gaza. The arrangement called for a four-day ceasefire during which Hamas would release a specified number of women and children, and international organizations would have access to remaining hostages to provide medical care. Israel’s permanent representative to the United Nations stated that after the pause, efforts would continue to address the underlying issues in the Palestinian territories. The ceasefire began operating on November 24 and set the stage for subsequent discussions about further releases and humanitarian provisions.
The discourse surrounding these events has included calls from European voices urging the rapid establishment of an independent Palestinian state, reflecting broader international debates about the path to peace and stability in the region.
Overall, Bolton’s remarks frame the ceasefire as a potential turning point that could influence both the immediate military dynamics and the long-term political landscape in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Observers note that the interplay between tactical pauses and strategic objectives will continue to shape responses from regional actors, international partners, and humanitarian authorities as the situation evolves.