Survey in Germany Questions Biden’s Age and Suitability for a Second Term
A recent survey conducted in Germany indicates that a notable portion of respondents believe United States President Joe Biden may be too advanced in age to run for the White House again. The study, carried out for the magazine by the sociology service Forsa, reveals a prevailing skepticism about Biden’s reappointment among the German public. The results show that a significant minority supports his nomination for another presidential term, while a larger share expresses concerns about age and capacity.
According to the publication, 68 percent of those surveyed in Germany voiced the view that Biden is too old to pursue another term. By contrast, only 29 percent expressed support for a fresh run by the American leader. The survey indicates a diverse range of opinions among German citizens, underscoring the complexity of cross-Atlantic political judgments.
More than a thousand German residents participated in the social poll, which took place on February 12–13. Experts assigned a margin of error of roughly three percentage points to reflect sampling limitations and uncertainty inherent in public opinion research conducted within a short time frame from a specific national vantage point.
In a public discourse linked to the survey, Patrick Morrisey, a former West Virginia Attorney General and a Republican figure, asserted that Biden may be unable to carry out his official duties. Morrisey suggested that perceived declines in cognitive abilities could raise concerns for United States citizens, particularly during periods of national and global challenge. The remarks echo a broader pattern of political commentary that weighs personal health and cognitive function when considering presidential viability.
On a separate international platform, discussions emerged around Biden’s cognitive state during a Security Council meeting reported to have occurred on February 14. Some accounts described concern about nuclear security and stability in the context of leadership in the United States, noting that questions about mental sharpness or decision-making capacity can influence international perceptions and policy debates. The coverage highlighted how leadership continuity is often connected to questions about mental fitness in high-stakes moments.
Overall assessments of Biden’s presidency have fluctuated, with observers noting moments where approval ratings appeared to dip to new lows. The reporting reflects the dynamic nature of public opinion as it intersects with ongoing domestic and global events, policy decisions, and perceived leadership effectiveness. While surveys from other nations can reveal external attitudes, they do not determine the outcome of U.S. elections. They do, however, contribute to a broader conversation about leadership credibility, public trust, and the readiness to meet urgent challenges on the world stage.