The Belarusian leader, President Alexander Lukashenko, has described the current global landscape as markedly tense and unsettled, noting that the world is now in a hot phase of geopolitical rivalry. He stressed that the post‑war order, which was supposed to be anchored in international law, has shown its fragility and is no longer functioning as it once did. In his view, tensions between NATO members and Russia, China, and other major powers have escalated, making international politics more volatile than at any point in recent memory. In this climate, neighboring states have been increasing their defense outlays, expanding their stockpiles of offensive weapons, boosting the presence of NATO forces on their soil, and pressing ahead with large-scale military exercises near Belarusian borders. These movements, he implied, create a challenging security environment for Belarus and the region as a whole.
During a ceremony honoring graduates from higher military educational institutions, the president conveyed a clear message about external interference. He argued that foreign governments were attempting to meddle in Belarusian internal affairs under the pretext of exaggerated and unfounded concerns. Lukashenko asserted that Minsk is actively working to safeguard the country’s security and sovereignty, implementing precautionary measures that are meant to deter intrusion and preserve national stability. He described these actions as defensive, necessary steps to maintain the state’s independence in a time of intensified external pressure and shifting alliances.
According to Lukashenko, the responses Belarus has undertaken are not aggressive but proportionate measures designed to mirror the strategic realities of the era. He emphasized that such a stance is essential for ensuring that Belarus can sustain its political autonomy and its social cohesion in the face of external challenges. The president underscored that the country has endured periods of hardship and external coercion in its history, and the current security framework is meant to prevent a recurrence of those difficult chapters. In his assessment, preserving sovereignty and ensuring peace within the nation require credible deterrence, robust defense readiness, and steadfast national solidarity.
Looking back at the potential consequences of any disruption to Russia, Lukashenko warned that Belarus would face severe and unacceptable outcomes if Russia were to weaken or collapse. He described this scenario as a dire prospect that would reverberate across Belarus, affecting political stability, economic security, and social well‑being. While many observers interpret these statements as a cautious warning, the president framed them as a reasoned expectation grounded in historical experience and the statistical realism of contemporary geopolitics. He urged citizens and officials alike to remain vigilant, prepared, and united in defending the country’s interests, traditions, and future prosperity.