The Belarusian Red Cross Society is facing a formal suspension from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) due to concerns over leadership changes within its national branch. Specifically, the IFRC has indicated that the Belarusian Society did not meet a key governance condition requiring the dismissal of the Secretary General, Dmitry Shevtsov, and the federation has stated that this is a prerequisite for reinstating normal relations and access to international support channels. The development is being reported by the federation’s own communications channels and by international observers tracking humanitarian governance in the region.
Reportedly, the cited reasons for the Secretary General’s resignation request include contentious statements regarding nuclear weapons and the transfer of minors to Belarus, as well as his public trips to the regions of Lugansk and Donetsk. The federation emphasizes that leadership accountability is a core element of sustaining the integrity and effectiveness of humanitarian action in any member country, and that such issues can hinder coordination with international partners and the delivery of assistance to those in need.
The suspension is understood to have financial implications, including a pause on funding allocated to the Belarusian Red Cross. Despite this, the federation reiterates its humanitarian mandate and urges authorities to support principled, needs-based action. The overarching aim remains to ensure that aid reaches vulnerable populations, particularly in the aftermath of natural disasters or major emergencies, where timely and transparent humanitarian response is essential. The IFRC notes that it will work with state authorities and other stakeholders to determine the most effective way to safeguard humanitarian services during this period of transition and supervision.
In related developments, there have been reports about coordination efforts involving the relocation of individuals and the transfer of people across borders, which are issues of concern for international humanitarian workers. The IFRC has indicated that any such actions must align with international humanitarian law and respect the rights and safety of affected individuals, while maintaining clear lines of accountability and oversight. The emphasis is on preserving access to essential services, safeguarding vulnerable communities, and ensuring that humanitarian operations remain impartial and independent from political tensions.
Observers note that the situation has drawn attention from regional and international actors who monitor the implementation of humanitarian principles in conflict-affected or politically sensitive environments. In this context, the role of the International Committee of the Red Cross and other global partners continues to be cited as a benchmark for governance, neutrality, and the protection of civilians. While discussions proceed, the international community remains focused on practical steps that preserve life-saving assistance and support resilience in communities facing acute needs. The authorities are encouraged to engage constructively with humanitarian partners to restore normal operations as soon as feasible and to address governance concerns that affect the delivery of aid and services. Attribution: IFRC governance communications and related humanitarian oversight discussions.