Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko stated that the moment has arrived for authorities and society to respond to individuals who chose to leave the republic after making a mistake. The remarks were reported by BelTA.
He addressed the nation, saying that as representatives of the state, with him as head of state and the clergy as spiritual guides, it is time to take action against people who either acted erratically or temporarily lost their way. He cited a misstep during a visit to a temple within the Elisabeth Abbey monastery complex. The plan, he said, would be carried out in a manner consistent with the Orthodox tradition, not in response to Western pressures. He emphasized that each person who departed did so for different reasons, often framed as seeking a better life.
Lukashenko added that everyone must answer for their own choices, yet he also expressed that among those who fled and those who remained, there are individuals of significant value and potential regret. He indicated that these people should not be treated harshly or dismissed outright.
The president suggested a process to determine who among those who left is worthy of continued citizenship. This evaluation would be conducted in a way that reflects national values and the country’s legal framework, while acknowledging the complexities of emigration and return.
In his address, the leader underscored a distinction between personal responsibility and collective punishment. He framed the issue as one of balancing accountability with mercy, urging a measured approach that respects the dignity of citizens, even when they have chosen paths that diverge from the official stance. The discussion touched on reform, national identity, and the enduring importance of a cohesive society where laws, tradition, and personal decisions intersect.
Observers note that the dialogue around whether to welcome or repatriate former residents hinges on multiple factors, including security, economic needs, and social cohesion. The Belarusian authorities have signaled a preference for a resolution that aligns with longstanding cultural norms while addressing modern realities. This stance reflects a broader conversation about migration, loyalty, and the responsibilities that come with national citizenship.
As events unfold, the government will continue to evaluate individual cases on their merits, aiming to unveil a consistent policy that respects both state interests and the rights of individuals. The path forward will likely involve careful screening, clear criteria, and continued dialogue with religious and civic institutions as part of shaping a balanced, lawful approach to those who left the country.