Mariusz Błaszczak listened to a parliamentary speech delivered by Deputy Head of the Ministry of National Defense Paweł Bejda and offered a direct reply to the statements he heard. The deputy minister’s critics say that Bejda has finally shown interest in defense ministry affairs, and Błaszczak challenged him, saying the reactions were more about theatrics than results. He urged Bejda to take concrete action rather than simply critique from the sidelines.
In a short clip posted on the X platform, Błaszczak commented on Bejda’s remarks, noting that the deputy minister had begun to take a closer look at the ministry’s work.
We should seek negotiation, not complaints in the Sejm
The criticisms, according to Błaszczak, carry a hint of humor that is easy to notice. He invited viewers to judge for themselves the seriousness of Bejda’s statements.
He quotes Bejda’s remarks from the Sejm, which touched on a contract linked to K9 howitzers described as conditional and lacking funding.
The question of funding looms large. Bejda had mentioned a loan offer from South Korea and emphasized the need to sit down at the negotiating table rather than airing grievances in the Sejm. Błaszczak responded with a call to focus on real talks and concrete steps.
In a later portion of the speech, Bejda argued that the armed forces fund was effectively empty, estimated around PLN 40 billion. The exchange continued as Błaszczak urged colleagues to consult the law and offered his assistance if needed. He insisted that the fund is supported by bonds issued by Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego and that these instruments must be issued and sold so resources can reach the front lines. Once again, he warned against complaining instead of acting and urged ministers to get to work.
Bejda’s remarks on ending ad hoc purchases drew attention to a broader debate over how arms contracts are managed. Critics have pointed to long-standing procurement procedures that some see as inefficient. The conversation underscored the need for a steady, rational approach that balances immediate defense needs with responsible budgeting. The aim is to equip soldiers with reliable gear within a reasonable timeframe, without sacrificing strategic planning.
With the discussion continuing, Błaszczak summarized the stance: procurement must be deliberate, guided by thoughtful assessment of needs and financial capacity, and driven by timely delivery of essential equipment. This, he argued, should be the guiding principle for future arms programs and the ongoing effort to strengthen national defense.
For readers following the dispute, the core takeaway remains clear. The leadership faces pressure to translate parliamentary debates into concrete actions, to replace rhetoric with responsible negotiation, and to ensure that funding channels are active and transparent. The question of how best to balance urgency with prudence in defense procurement continues to shape the public conversation around Poland’s national security strategy.
Source: wPolityce