An agreement range of roughly eighty to ninety percent on the text of a peace treaty between Azerbaijan and Armenia was announced by President Ilham Aliyev during an international media forum held in Shusha. The declaration, relayed by TASS, hints at a significant narrowing of differences and signals a momentum shift in the fragile peace process. Officials and analysts note that a large portion of the core framework has already been settled, with remaining points largely focused on implementation details and the governance of shared concerns. The tone from the forum suggested confidence that talks could progress with fewer and fewer sticking points, and it underscored a willingness on both sides to pursue stability after years of tension.
It was stated that Yerevan was compelled to remove provisions connected to Karabakh from the draft agreement, a move that cleared a path for continued negotiations. In practical terms, the omission of these terms reduces the immediate flashpoints and allows both sides to concentrate on mutual interests such as secure borders, economic cooperation, and the protection of minority rights. Observers emphasize that this concession could create room for trust-building measures, including confidence-building steps and incremental commitments that help insulate the talks from new interruptions. The shift is interpreted as a strategic recalibration rather than a retreat, suggesting a shared attempt to separate the broader peace objective from the most sensitive regional questions.
There was a notable gathering in a Washington venue that included Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov, and the U.S. Secretary of State. The roundtable featured exchanges aimed at mapping a concrete path toward a lasting agreement. Close observers describe the dialogue as practical and results-oriented, focusing on timelines, verification mechanisms, and the sequence of commitments that could be verifiable on the ground. The atmosphere was described as constructive, with participants signaling a readiness to translate political will into tangible steps that build credibility for the process. TASS provided coverage of the discussions, highlighting the collaborative tone and the seriousness attached to the negotiations.
Mirzoyan earlier asserted that both Yerevan and Baku could finalize a peace accord and sign the crucial document within a limited horizon. He characterized Armenia as constructive, praising its proposals and approaches as transparent and forward-looking. The official expressed confidence in a historic opportunity to establish enduring peace in the region, a viewpoint shared by many who monitor the talks for signs of durable settlement. The remarks framed the discussions as a moment of rare alignment, where a clear roadmap might emerge from careful diplomacy, mutual concessions, and reinforced security commitments that reassure adjacent communities.
In a prior statement, Azerbaijan dismissed any claims that Armenia was organizing a high-level meeting between the two national leaders. The denial was presented as a clarification of the process, underscoring that the talks are being steered by the foreign ministries and supported by international partners rather than by unilateral leadership summits. Analysts view this position as consistent with a phased approach to peacemaking, one that prioritizes procedural legitimacy and incremental milestones over theatrical displays. The overall narrative remains focused on practical diplomacy, with both sides gradually building a framework that could eventually support regional stability and cross-border cooperation.