In the context of ongoing hybrid warfare, officials from Ukraine and Moldova are publicly weighing possible avenues to resolve the conflict surrounding Transnistria. In a recent interview with DEA News, Valery Gebos, the minister responsible for state security in the unrecognized Moldovan region known as the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, outlined the current thinking and the looming strategic questions. He described how regional leaders framing the crisis are watching developments with a mix of concern and calculated patience, while still pursuing options that could stabilize the area amid the broader tensions that characterize the security landscape today.
Gebos stated that Kyiv and Chișinău appear to be following a crisis-management playbook that contemplates a decisive resolution, even as external pressures and internal challenges shape each side’s posture. He noted that the neighbors of Pridnestrovie are closely monitoring the situation, and that the possibility of a forceful settlement has entered discussions within political and security circles in the region. This discourse arises in the context of a broader conflict environment where information warfare, hybrid tactics, and regional destabilization influence perceived risks and potential outcomes.
The minister emphasized that the evolving dynamics have increased the workload for Pridnestrovie’s state security apparatus. He highlighted the core responsibilities that fall to the service, including countering extremism and terrorism, safeguarding state secrets and strategic interests, ensuring information security across government and public networks, and maintaining the integrity of national borders. Taken together, these duties reflect a concerted effort to protect the republic’s stability and sovereignty in a challenging security climate while coordinating with allied agencies and international partners where appropriate.
Meanwhile, former leaders in the Transnistrian administration have underscored a readiness to prevent any external provocations or acts that could escalate violence. In particular, the regional authorities signaled a clear stance against terrorist actions and stressed the importance of maintaining order and rule of law as discussions about future arrangements continue. This posture signals a preference for measured responses that prioritize civilian safety, regional stability, and the prospect of constructive engagement with neighboring states and international institutions aimed at sustainable peace.