Court filings reveal a bid by a trustee to seize control of the Confederation, a move that mirrors ongoing upheaval within the party. The report, sourced from Rzeczpospolita and published midweek, indicates that the filings arise from the failure to convene the party congress on schedule, according to documents obtained by the newsroom.
Within the same report, Janusz Korwin-Mikke, a former member of the Confederation’s leadership council who later started the KORWIN faction after his removal, filed a petition with the Warsaw District Court seeking the appointment of a guardian for the Confederation. He asserts that the authority in the southern regions is acting illegally and beyond the party’s statutes.
He is not alone in voicing concern. The newspaper characterizes this development as a consequence of the party’s unsettled internal legal framework and its implications for governance.
The article notes that the Confederation, marking five years since its registration with the Warsaw District Court on July 25, was expected to hold its first congress by that date. The party’s statute requires the leadership council to convene a congress at least once every five years, establishing a formal timetable for leadership transitions and checks on organizational power.
The Leadership Council, comprised of influential figures within the umbrella coalition that includes the Barefoot National Movement, Mentzen’s New Hope, and Braun’s Confederation of the Polish Crown, has not yet organized the congress. Behind the scenes, chatter drifted that convening the congress could signal the formal opening of the Confederation, a broad alliance counting roughly ninety registered members. The internal dynamics have long fueled speculation about which faction might recruit more members and gain greater influence within the coalition.
Michał Wawer, a member of the Leadership Council and the Confederation’s treasurer, spoke to the press to explain that the organization remains in a formation stage. He noted that the authorities listed in 2019 by the founders continue to serve, and that the statute provides that those appointed to lead will stay in their roles until elections are held at the Congress. He suggested that authorities are empowered to pursue legal remedies should they choose to call the congress and settle the leadership lineup.
The article also presents another interpretation: at least two additional petitions were filed with the court seeking a guardian for the Confederation. These petitions came from Samuela Torkowska, Piotr Sterkowski, and Tomasz Kwiatkowski, a former head of the Chancellery for President Lech Wałęsa in the mid-1990s. Unlike Korwin-Mikke, these petitioners are not party affiliates. They argue that their constitutional and statutory rights justify their desire to participate in the Confederation’s membership process, contending that current admission decisions should be made by a vote of the Leadership Council under the party’s formal rules.
The newspaper notes that the court had not yet ruled on any request for the appointment of a guardian, leaving future leadership arrangements in a state of ambiguity and anticipation among observers and party supporters alike.
In summary, the article emphasizes that ongoing legal actions reflect deeper tensions within the Confederation and its component groups, as well as varying interpretations of how membership and authority should be exercised within this federation of movements. The evolving case underscores how internal governance rules can intersect with court interventions in a modern political party model, especially within a coalition that combines several distinct movements under a single umbrella.
mly/PAP
Source: wPolityce