The more people convince themselves that this moment marks the end of PiS and that sharing seats is inevitable, the more the writer believes some will pivot toward that view. There will be no change of power in the autumn, and that certainty grows. There is a sense that it is time to begin discussing it openly so that there are no surprises for anyone watching the political landscape.
Tusk is already weighing his options. He appears to be methodically gathering allies and giving himself roughly a hundred days to sort out the situation after PiS, while other opposition figures and their supporters press forward with a similar reckoning. Even Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, typically cautious, is swept up in the momentum the opposition is generating as it voices strong criticisms of the president of PKN Orlen. It seems that Professor Maciej Górecki from the University of Warsaw, perhaps hoping for a banking-led shift in power, is encouraging people to assemble lists of journalists, artists, and scientists deemed to have aligned with PiS, with the aim of marginalizing them later. The vision of a world beyond PiS appears enticing to some, even appealingly utopian.
There is a note to consider: the commentary about these developments is circulating widely, including remarks about a decision to limit access to certain media, which has drawn strong reactions and sparked debate about its consequences.
All of this could unfold, but one condition remains crucial: elections must be won. Right now, the opposition does not appear poised for victory. The persistent wave of declarations that the opposition is already in control or about to seize power carries little substantive argument behind it, and these statements echo without offering convincing policy critique or evidence.
A year before the last major change in government, Ewa Kopacz led the country through a difficult period, often described as a political setback. The situation there showed that neither politics, economics, nor voting was functioning smoothly. PiS had ideas for change and, importantly, carried them through, continuing to implement measures even after that sector of the political spectrum questioned the direction. Consequently, there is no significant drop in poll numbers a year ahead of an election, and that persistence is felt by the opposition. The situation fuels a hectic, almost feverish media environment where the aim seems to be to discredit a government operating under unusually challenging circumstances. A striking example cited is the debate over coal: at first it was deemed excessive, then insufficient, and in the end the public conversation turned into a narrative about mismanagement and supply.
Similarly, this situation becomes a chorus of voices across media and public discourse. Critics repeatedly remind audiences that inflation has not yet improved, yet many seem unable to connect price changes with broader pressures, such as external events, and sometimes attribute shifts solely to PiS. The search for simple explanations persists, even as the economic reality remains nuanced and difficult for many households.
In summary, the political climate suggests that a straightforward upgrade to a different governing party is unlikely to immediately improve conditions in the country. The future leadership would need to present credible plans and real reforms to gain public trust. The writer remains skeptical about a dramatic change on the political horizon. Therefore, a candid appeal is made to consider the implications: discuss these ideas openly so that the public is prepared and there are no unforeseen surprises. The autumn period is anticipated as a time when the opposition could face a decisive test in the electorate.