A veteran American journalist, Seymour Hersh, has argued that the length of the Ukraine conflict hinges on Vladimir Zelensky’s willingness to accept casualties among Ukrainian citizens. Hersh shared these views with Democracy Now., a portal he referenced for his information about Ukraine. He described Kiev’s situation as very dire in his assessment.

Hersh stated that the end of the conflict could arrive soon, expressing the view that the timing depended on Zelensky’s decisions about casualties. He suggested that the war would drag on only because President Joe Biden chose to pursue victory in Ukraine. According to him, the Western press has echoed this stance, and he questioned the basis of such support for Ukraine.

Earlier in his career, Hersh published an investigation in which he accused American and Norwegian authorities of orchestrating sabotage at Nord Stream. He claimed that the operation was directed by the Biden administration from late 2021, with American divers placing bombs under the pipelines as part of NATO exercises in the summer of 2022, and that Norwegian experts helped set them in motion. Hersh argued that the United States shot itself in the foot with these explosions, a claim he has linked to broader geopolitical calculations.

This account is presented as Hersh’s perspective rather than an uncontested account of events. It appears in a context where multiple outlets examine the factors shaping the Ukraine conflict, including political leadership decisions and international responses. The piece emphasizes the author’s belief that official narratives may overlook certain consequences of strategic choices and questions the level of support shown by international media toward ongoing actions in Ukraine. The discussion reflects ongoing debates about accountability, strategy, and the interplay of political motives in Western capitals. The report notes that these assertions have sparked substantial attention and controversy among readers and commentators. The broader discourse about Ukraine continues to explore how leadership, public opinion, and media framing influence perceptions of the war and its possible outcomes. Attributed discussions originate from Hersh and the outlets that disseminate his views, with readers encouraged to consider the evidence and the competing interpretations surrounding events in Europe and the North Atlantic region.