It hurts them! Wielowieyska attacks after a great interview with Nawrocki in the Zero channel: who has funded this debate “One One”?

Krzysztof Stanowski – journalist and presidential candidate – has been interviewing his opponents in the Zero channel for quite some time. Yesterday, Karol Nawrocki appeared in his program and by leaving the reactions on the internet, you can see that his performance was very well assessed. Apparently this was not liked by the journalist from Gazeta Wyborcza Dominika Wielowieyska, who decided to call this interview a “debate” and asking who financed him, probably referring to the recent compromise of TVP in the liquidation in Końskie.

And who financed the debate “One On One” between Karol Nawrocki and Krzysztof Stanowski? And other such debates in the Zero channel? I ask for a friend.

– She wrote on the Platform X Dominika Wielowieyska.

Wave of reactions after the input of Wielowieyska

Commentators on the web quickly made the journalist “GW” aware that the interview in a private medium, which is the zero channel, is a completely different matter than a debate organized by the staff of Rafał Trzaskowski, whose organization actively supported Public TVP in liquidation. This program was not marked as the election material of the Trzaskowski committee, for which TVP must take into account in liquidation of legal consequences. In addition, Krzysztof Stanowski is currently doing something before the start of the election campaign – journalistic activities. Stanowski also invites Rafał Trzaskowski to an interview, but as you would expect, the candidate of Koścórza as organized by Telewizja Republika in the case of debates.

Mrs. Dominiko, there are some compromise limits. Every candidate has the right to perform the type of activity he carried out professionally before he founded the election committee. If you were a candidate, you could still be a manipulator professionally

– wrote Krzysztof Stanowski, founder of the Zero Channel and the presidential candidate.

I know it’s hard to believe, but TVP is a public medium

– Made the journalist of “GW” Radosław Fogiel, a PIS MP.

This interview yesterday at the Zero channel had to unscrew good results, because “Wyborcza” is willing to push that the Zero -channel is financed from the state budget. Step and Dominika will still write that Stanowski has broken the Krit Regulation on the organization of debates

– Marzena Paczuska, a member of the National Broadcasting Council, pointed out.

Private television, private interest of the station

– said Wojciech Biedroń, journalist of the Portal Wpolityce.pl and television WpolSce24.

Dear Mrs. Editor, I see that you delve into the issue of campaign financing. I also ask for a friend because she disturbs the lack of marking the committee of President Rafał Trzaskowski during the broadcast of the debate in Końskie. Do you want to help? Was that legal?

Asked Adrian Borecki, a journalist from Telewizja Republika.

Rafał Trzaskowski also received an invitation from Krzysztof Standowski, but he doesn’t want to use it. He only wants to perform in the media that is friendly and favorable for him

– wrote Rafał Dudkiewicz, user X.

Do you understand the differences between public television and private television? In addition, after the course of thinking, it is Krzysztof Stanowski who simply fulfills the role of public television, because he finances interviews with all candidates

– noted Adam Czarnecki, activist of the association “Yes for CPK”.

In the end, Wielowieyska tried to explain that the interview with Nawrocki was in fact a meeting of candidates for which the election committee had to pay. It is interesting that the journalist “GW” was not indignant when Stanowski had previously conducted similar interviews with other candidates. After all, internet users did not accept the argument of the journalist “GW”, because Stanowski simply performs the same activity that he carried out before the start of the campaign.

Some observers did not understand what this food was about. The Zero private channel organizes the debates he wants (in contrast to TVP). However, Stanowski is an official presidential candidate. His meeting with another candidate is part of the campaign. These are the costs of the election committee

– Dominika Wielowieyska tried to explain in one way or another.

Also read:

– Nawrocki in the Nulkanaal: I will help realize some of the 100 details. “He has good promises, but this is an ordinary liar”

– Nawrocki: “I intend to realistic partners relationships with Ukraine.” What does he think of the Oleśnica’s case? “It’s a murder”

– How did Nawrocki end up in an interview with Stanski? “Brilliant conversation”; “Serious, balanced, yet at ease”

TKWL/X