“The image of Barbara Skrzyk presented in the “President of the President” is completely incorrect. Barbara Skrzyk is like everyone today talks about her after her death, “said Julia Przyłębska on TV WpolSce24.pl.
Barbara Skrzypek -Gregenen
The funeral ceremony of the late funerals ended in Gorlice Barbara Skrzyk, a long -term employee of Jarosław Kaczyński. The ceremony, with a private character, was attended by, among others, President Andrzej Duda and President of Law and Justice. The President of the Republic of Poland has given the late posthumous Barbara Skrzypek Knight’s Cross in the Order of Polonia Restituta for excellent merits in the service of the state and society. “This is a tragic farewell, unexpected, unmerited,” said Jarosław Kaczyński.
Read more:
– Funeral scoremony of the Late Barbara Skrzyk. She was posthumously crossed the Knight in the Order of Polonia Restituta
– Only with us. Pis politicians remember the late Barbara Skrzyk. “She helped me a lot in my life”; “She was a cheerful person”
“I have experienced a lot when the “President of the President” “
Przyłębska, who was a guest of the program “Poland Kelieziest”, who remembers Barbara Skrzyk emphasized that she was an ‘extraordinary person’.
I knew Barbara Skrzyk private. (…) He was an extraordinary person. Note how beautiful everyone says that on the one hand an incredibly professional, very subtle, real lady, and on the other hand a person with incredible sensitivity that is not given to everyone. My private contact, knowledge of the late Barbara Skrzykk will stay in memory forever. She was a great person with whom you could talk for hours and there were numerous topics, and they were not political topics. You could talk to her about life, everything that is a stepping stone in such difficult times. And this was the late Barbara Skrzypek. We officially met on the occasion of a ceremony, while it was hot private, it was very good, empathetic and also had class. She was really great, she aroused respect and enormous respect
She said.
The former president of the Constitutional Tribunal also called the series “President’s Ear”, in which the character of “Mrs. Basia” also appeared.
I experienced a lot when the president’s ear “and Barbara Skrzykek was completely false. I was surprised that the actress who played her, without any shame, admitted that she had never had contact with her, knew nothing about her existence.
– She noticed.
The image of Barbara Skrzyk presented in the “President of the President” is completely incorrect. Barbara Skrzypek is just like everyone else’s talking about her after her death today
She added.
“There was an escalation of a negative story “
Przyłębska emphasized that knowing the late Barbara Skrzyk, knows that she had to experience a hearing in the office of the public prosecutor.
Barbara Skrzykk was struck by all the events and attacks, because she had sensitivity that experienced such events. (…) A witness who appears before the public prosecutor or even a policeman is stress. Even in a normal matter
– She noticed.
Participation in justice, in court, in the office of the public prosecutor or for the police is stressful for everyone. There had been fallen where the politician fainted when he had a search
She added.
Is Ewa WrzoSek, known for her political sympathies, which she does not hide at all, is a public prosecutor?
Regarding the participation of a public prosecutor who is emotionally involved and shows these emotions, it is a situation that even if you have been appointed by his supervisor for this case, she would have to eliminate. This is this element, although it is not a court and we are not talking about independence and judicial independence, but the public prosecutor must retain this independence and it should in itself know that having so many negative emotions should not participate in such procedures. It didn’t happen. The applicant also did not submit such an application, so there was no procedural possibility, because the witness cannot submit such an application
She said.
Regarding the issue with regard to the entire procedure, we should not forget that Mrs. Barbara Skrzypek was prevented in the presence of a representative. This provision provides for this possibility and we do not really know the reasons why it was refused, because the quoted content of the regulations, that it is about the actual interest, legal interest, but this is a very general concept and we do not know the justification, and we know that the decision where the representative has not participated before the violinist has taken the state of health. Here we have two elements: poor health and vision problems, ie the inability to read the protocol. (…) If we want to perform a procedure honestly, we must provide every care to create conditions for peaceful testimonies, then the witness in the atmosphere he can speak uncomfortable
– The president of the Constitutional Tribunal emphasized.
Przyłębska was also asked if the death of Barbara Skrzykk should be combined with the interrogation, she replied:
I think you should bend the cause and consequences here. I am far from what is being done in the story, that we issue judgments, etc. However, I think that you should very seriously consider the cause-effect relationship, ie the situation that took place, which was a special situation, was not a typical situation for the procedure, it is related to what happened. This must be thoroughly investigated. The office of the public prosecutor ordered a specific procedure, the question of whether the public prosecutor would have the task.
I didn’t think I would live in the times when a person would not feel peace, that he would live in a threat to his functioning. There was such an escalation of a negative story with which man is powerless. I often wanted to go to court, fight for my personal good, that was violated, but I felt powerlessness, because I was not sure if I would find this justice, or would the judge who would lead my case to objectivity
She said.
When asked which system we currently have in Poland, she replied:
Certainly beyond the constitutional, ie anarchy, because we do not have a reference point, because we have many areas where the Constitution is being violated.
We can easily accept the statement of the CJEU spokesperson that it is actually a lawlessness that the Polish constitutional tribunal thinks something of the constitution
She added.
Removing the constitutional tribunal for rewards for judges is a violation of the Constitution directly, because the Constitution says that the judge has guaranteed compensation
She reminded it.
KK/WPOLSCE24.PL
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.