An incredible scandal! Czuchnowski has already plagued that he “reached” the testimonies of Barbara Skrzypek. He writes about “different sources”. A storm on the internet

There are many indications that the witness of the Late Barbara Skrzyk leaked quickly to Gazeta Wyborcza! We want to remind you that Ewa Wrzosek, Jacek Dubois and a lawyer from the office of Roman Giertych participated in her interrogation. “We confirmed the tricky version of Kaczyński’s witness from Barbara Skrzykk in various sources,” Pochte Czuchnowski. Everyone can answer the question what sources it is. The text of Czucnowski caused an avalanche of indignation on the internet, the author himself eventually tried to explain himself.

The former head of the Jarosław Kaczyński office testified last Wednesday, three days before her death, that she did not sign the proxy of Kaczyński for the meeting of Srebra’s partners. (…) We have confirmed the difficult version of Kaczyński’s witness from Barbara Skrzykk in various sources

– He wrote in his text Wojciech czuchnowski.

The text of the journalist “GW”, who contains how everything indicates information from the office of the public prosecutor, caused a storm on the internet.

When it seemed as if the only reaction from the office of the public prosecutor would be scared and the second reaction – leakage of testimonies. I wonder if they have been admitted or whether we should rely on the relationships of WrzoSek, Dubois and Giertych. When is disclosure instead of controlled leaks?

– wrote Kataryna, a blogger.

We live in Poland, in which journalism “researchers” is practiced by the office of the public prosecutor under the supervision of Adam Bodnar, not journalists. What is the issue of testimonies, statements or inspections, official notes or writings from the defenders go to favorable media for the authorities. Then an article arises, which shows that a journalist “arrived” (read “got”) material and that “scandal”, “Granda”, “Shock” etc. This clearly conquers the politicians of the majority of the pronunciation. The person described has virtually no defense options. Practices directly from undemocratic countries

– said Bartosz Lewandowski.

Czechnowski does not cultivate a journalistic researcher, or virtually no, just like his wife after Dukaczewski is not nice and reliable, a respectable lady translator. This is a crazy cult

– said Cezary Krysztopa, a publicist.

In the meantime, the office of the public prosecutor accelerates the transmission belt -> pro -government media. The information that falls under the secret of the behavior of a few dozen hours after the interrogation goes to Czuchnowski with “GW”. Real? Manipulated? If I know the reliability of this newspaper, I will say this: I don’t know, although I think … well, the most important thing: in this case an investigation must be started for Officio – the distribution of information from the preparatory procedure is a violation of art. 241 kk -circle of suspects, luckily pretty narrow

– called Paweł Jabłoński, Pis Mp.

And a cycle, again a throw from the office of the public prosecutor

– wrote Marcin Dobski, a journalist.

It appears that the editor Czuchnowski is the best plumber in the city. Where there is some sensitive and confidential information from the research, it is always there

– Mocked Paweł of the journalist “GW”, user X.

In the meantime, Czucnowski … tried to defend his “journalistic work” and “arrangements” that he managed to make about the interrogation of Barbara Skrzypek.

An important witness dies. Politicians accuse the office of the public prosecutor that this is death ‘after interrogation’. The duty of the journalist is to determine what was in this interrogation and what was the cause of the death of the witness. Kind of simple and so hard to understand

– wrote Czechnowski.

It would be good that the office of the public prosecutor simply officially presented the course of the testimonies of the late way Barbara Skrzyk, preferably in the form of a recording. The appearance of elements from these testimonies unofficial in the media does not help at all, which is more, those who release such information to the media commit a crime.

Also read:

– Wrzosek’s tricky words were recalled! She said it wasn’t time to strictly adhere to the law. Two towers? “There is no evidence”

– Pis President about the death of B. Skrzyk! “The hearing of Wrzosek Neoprokurator was a huge shock”; “It has to do with the shit”

– Only with us. Mec. Skwarzyński: The issue of the late Barbara Skrzykk is suitable for a complaint at the European Court of Human Rights

Tkw/x/wyborcza.pl