Only with us. Zawadzki of “judges of the Republic of Poland”: I understand that the office of the public prosecutor will start a procedure with regard to the death of Barbara Skrzypek

“At first glance we can see that we may be dealing with an attempt to get something from a witness and inequalities when dealing with the parties on these proceedings, “judge łukasz Zawadzki of the association” Judges of the Republic Poland, “said on television. In his opinion, the circumstances of the death of the office of the office of justier of shatis should be inquired in it -Diepwing statements were carried out by the Public Prosecution Service. Other party was represented by two lawyers.

The death of Barbara Skrzypek deeply shook public opinion. According to judge łukasz Zawadzki of the National Association of Judges, “judges of the Republic Poland”, everyone expects that the office of the public prosecutor will explain the procedure that the circumstances of the death of the recently interrogated, among others, explains the public prosecutor EWA WRZOSEK BARBARA SKRZYPEKK.

The provisions at the office of the public prosecutor require that they monitor the rule of law. In this situation we have to deal with circumstances about the deprivation of witness the right to use the help of a lawyer in procedural law. And we know that this representative was appointed, because it is not that Barbara Skrzyk only came to the office of the public prosecutor and had no representative. She had him, but he was not allowed to do this. We are also dealing with the public prosecutor who carries out the procedure, who is treated in social reception as a person involved in a political dispute. Her statements are known, with whom Ewa WrzoSek Officer did not hide. We also have to deal with a situation in which two lawyer of the victim participates in the interrogation at the same time. At first glance you can see that we may be dealing with an attempt to extract something from a witness and unevenness when handling the parties on this procedure

– In this way, judge łukasz Zawadzki of the National Association of Judges “Judges of the Republic of Poland” summarized information about the death of Barbara Skrzypek. Earlier, however, he expressed deep regret and compassion because of her sudden death.

This is a tragedy and on behalf of the association “Judges of the Republic of Poland”, as well as mine, please accept condolence by their loved ones, family and friends of death, because we hear a very warm, friendly, friendly and dedicated to Poland. This is a very unpleasant news for us, especially because it relates to the circumstances of this death we learn about. We do not know what the direct cause of the death of Mrs. Barbara Skrzypek is, although the prison procedure, in contrast to the civil proceedings, assumes the possibility that a person other than a party also has a representative during the procedure. Barbara Skrzyk was such a person and witness. According to the criminal proceedings, she could set up such a representative and, according to the knowledge that is available for us, she has appointed him. However, this representative was not permitted in the procedural law

Judge Zawadzki said on TV Wpolska24.

Also read:

– Barbara Skrzyk is dead – “Mrs Basia”. She worked closely with the piss president. WrzoSek recently questioned her!

– Four hours or five? Hear from Barbara Skrzyk. WrzoSek, Giertych, Dubois have already lost? “Communication Chaos”

“This is a political issue “

Judge Zawadzki has no doubt and says directly that the two towers sent his politics.

The Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that a witness representative may be permitted if he requires the protection of its interests. It is so extensive that the assessment of whether this interest rates requires or does not belong to the entity that carries out the procedural activity. In this case, to the public prosecutor who decided that the interest of the witness was not threatened. From today’s perspective we can accept, but also from the perspective that prior to the interrogation that the required protection of the interests of such a witness was required because of the whole thing and the envelope, which she received many years earlier. We can immediately say that this is a political issue and we know it all

– the guest of television WpolSce24 evaluates.

We are dealing with a situation in which the procedural law was carried out by the public prosecutor, who spoke euphemistically, known for his statements about his political origin and dedication to one of the parties in the political conflict. It was the reality of this whole situation. In turn we know from the media reports that the victim was in this case (according to the office of the public prosecutor Gerald Birgfellner) had two proxy’s in the course of this activity. In turn, the interrogation (Barbara Skrzyk – note of the editor) lasted many hours. I understand that some procedures will be started at the death of Barbara Skrzyk and materials collected during the course of this procedure and the interrogation action will be proof here

– The judge of the “judges of the Republic of Poland” Association also referred to the announcement of the public prosecutor, who stated that for all attempts to combine the death of Barbara Skrzykek with the interrogation in the office of the public prosecutor.

After this message there are entries on platform X that say it is an attempt to intimidate and print so that such mentions do not appear. We will know the direct cause of death after the autopsy, we will find out if it was a long -term disease or a heart attack or a stroke. It is difficult for me to combine or not combine these situations in circumstances. Nevertheless, when this coincidence, ie interrogation and the approaching death of Barbara Skrzykk and what her friends and friends say about a mental breakdown, it is difficult for me to assume that it had no relationship. I hope that the procedure (if initiated – the editor bill) will show it

– broken about the position of the office of the public prosecutor Adam Bodnar Judge Zawadzki. He also referred to the information that Barbara Skrzypek was not instructed before he was questioned about the possibility of refusing to testify whether the answer could expose her or a person closest to her for criminal liability.

I am a citizen, but such an instrument of a witness is the basic principle of interrogation, ie informing that there is a criminal liability for giving false testimonies. If the witness is not instructed about this responsibility, he cannot be pulled

– In summary, the Judge łukasz Zawadzki case.

Also:

– Jarosław Kaczyński on television Wpolsce24: Barbara Skrzykk was refused the participation of a lawyer. She knew who this public prosecutor was

– Only with us. Ziobro: Bodnar is a gangster and a bandit. There is no politized public prosecutor more than a heath

– Pis politicians say goodbye to Barbara Skrzyk. “It deserved good Poland”; “The memory of the director will never die”; “Huge loss”

– Only with us. Wąsik: They wanted to bring Barbara Skrzyk to the state that he would say something. This interrogation had to cause enormous stress