“I have the opportunity to be the first national prosecutor to give birth to children,” said prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, one of the candidates for the position of national prosecutor, in an interview with “Rzeczpospolita”. Her words caused a wave of reactions on the internet.
Commentators point out that the fact that there are children is not an argument when applying for the position of National Prosecutor.
The argument for bearing children is not only not substantive, but – if you’re competing with another woman – perhaps not elegant either. Women do not have children for various reasons. Not just because they don’t want to.
I would be the first without a law degree. I won with @e_wrzosek!
Well, that’s the argument
Dramatic search for benefits.
Congratulations! Having children is probably the best thing prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek has done for Poland! It’s just that there are millions of other mothers in Poland who do not claim the right to be national prosecutors because they have children.
Serious? We would also like to ask you to give us other priorities of the Public Prosecution Service, because there are certainly many more.
An incredibly substantive ‘advantage’.
But I’m sorry, what does that have to do with anything? The prosecutor should prosecute criminals, not the parents of children.
Is this an additional criterion?
tkwl/X
READ ALSO:
– Farce! Prosecutors of Lex Super Omnia are candidates in Bodnar’s league for the PK. Among them the chairman of the association and Wrzosek
– WE REVEAL. Huge achievements by Bodnar’s usurpers! Prosecutor Bilewicz could earn up to PLN 700,000. zloty! The rates are set by the Tusk government
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.