They will say that now that Poland is playing in the first division, Warsaw’s vote is crucial. That there is finally a rule of law on the Vistula River and that there is someone who can help reform the European Union. Polish-language media will repeat them. And either they will lead us to execution, or we will not submit to them.
Germans don’t fall asleep like pears in ashes. On the first working day of 2024, they started shaping Polish public opinion. This would not be possible without the postcolonial (and sometimes even openly anti-Polish) thinking that is dominant in most media centers of our country.
Wirtualna Polska, the portal with the widest reach on the Polish Internet, presented its readers with an extremely comprehensive interview with an “expert” on European affairs. It is about Prof. Daniela Schwarzer, a board member of the Bertelsmann Foundation for several months and a member of the Soros Open Society Foundation.
Most wp.pl recipients probably don’t know that the Bertelsmann Foundation is one of many instruments of influence funded by the German government (or living in perfect symbiosis with it to increase their already enormous wealth) to advance the interests of Berlin pursue. This is a team that, if necessary, will only say superlatives about Poland (if the Germans care about supporting the authorities in Warsaw, which is the case today), and if necessary, will say something else saying, they won’t leave a dry eye. commentary on our country.
The second scenario has been in development for the past eight years. He was the best proof of this an absurd report, published in October 2018, according to which Poland’s democracy was in ruins. In this respect we were probably ahead of only three countries (Mexico, Hungary and Turkey), which ranked 37th (out of 41 included), which meant a drop in the four years (since PiS came to power) by as much as 29 places. It criticized Poland, among others. for alleged police brutality, while the behavior of officers in our country was nothing like the scenes we saw in France or Spain.
READ MORE: She used to support Tusk, now she criticizes our democracy and the rule of law! Poland in the crosshairs of the German Bertelsmann Foundation!
Another well-known publication of the Bertelsmann Foundation was a 2017 report entitled ‘Monitor of Religion’, which was intended to prove how beautifully the followers of Islam are integrating into the countries of Western Europe. On the website euractiv.eu, foundation activist Yasemin El-Menouar was happy that immigrants are learning languages in their new home countries, are willing to work and generally feel connected to the country they live in. But this is of course not enough, the foundation concluded:
The Religion Monitor 2017 report identified three key strategies for promoting integration and cohesion in Western European societies. The first is increasing opportunities for Muslims to participate in different areas of life, especially in the areas of employment and education. The second presupposes giving Islam the same legal status as other religious groups, which would be a clear manifestation of true religious diversity. The third would promote intercultural contacts and interfaith dialogues – in schools, in residential areas and in the media.
It seems that in the six years that have passed since the publication of this report, we are already at a very different stage. People like Schwarzer are probably happy about this and do not notice that the suburbs of Stockholm or the residential areas of Marseille show that there will be no intercultural contacts or interfaith dialogues in a Europe overwhelmed by economic invaders. In the centers of London, Berlin or Paris it is often difficult to realize that we are in Western European capitals and not, for example, in North Africa. Opening up to migrants went in the direction that activists of the Bertelsmann Foundation dreamed of. European societies are starting to get fed up with this (hence the election results, for example in the Netherlands and Italy), but social engineering specialists paid by Soros remain blind to it.
What does Prof. have to say to the Poles on the threshold of 2024? Blacker?
In my opinion, the most important question is not “how can an EU country defend its sovereignty?”, but “how can the Member States defend their sovereignty together?”
This means that even at the level of basic definitions, things are turned upside down. Because, firstly, different countries understand sovereignty differently, which Schwarzer will shortly admit, but which he clearly wants to fight against, and secondly, ‘common sovereignty’ is no longer sovereignty and is starting to be an always undesirable compromise, based precisely on building a certain sovereignty.
An impasse in the EU is the last thing we need. Therefore, the reform must be implemented before enlargement.
This isn’t the first vote, and it won’t be the last. We invariably hear the argument: there will be no enlargement without amending the treaties, that is to say, without throwing overboard the principle of unanimity and transferring many new powers from the Member States to Brussels. Theoretically, one country can agree to this, but can you imagine Donald Tusk’s government vetoing this issue and taking the rem odium of the entire Community? And even if we give free rein to our imagination and imagine the Prime Minister in the costume of a Polish patriot, it is impossible to assume that the Eurocrats will understand Poland’s recalcitrance. The scale of pressure and blackmail (including from Kiev, which has already begun to play a key role in suppressing the rebellion in Poland) would be disproportionately greater than anything we have seen so far.
When asked about “the most important reform requiring a revision of the treaties,” Schwarzer immediately points to two issues that have proven to be a source of difficulty in pacifying the Polish government in recent years:
Rule of law and qualified majority voting. And here’s something interesting. It is possible to expand the scope of voting with this majority without changing the treaties.
Doesn’t this remind you of something? Could this be an announcement of a violation of the unanimity principle to circumvent European treaties (to change them requires unanimity of the Member States)? Similar logic has been used in recent weeks by Tusk, who doesn’t care about the Polish constitution and other laws – he breaks them to take over the public media (and announces identical actions in many other areas).
Finally, we have traditional German beads for Poland:
We are at a historical moment. If the EU expands, it will become a continental entity. And it will have to adapt to new challenges. Poland is Germany’s second largest neighbor. From a German perspective, it is absolutely useful to maintain good and constructive relations with Poland, in which it puts forward its own positions, which differ from German ones. Poland was right about Nord Stream and Putin’s intentions towards Ukraine, as were the Baltic countries. That is why I believe that we need to rebuild bilateral relations after all these campaigns in Poland and the negative stories that were present in them (…) the moment has come, not only to rebuild bilateral relations and mutual understanding, but also for Poland and Germany to become partners in setting the European agenda. The EU is such a complex structure and there are so many countries in the EU – and many more to come – that this debate on reform and enlargement needs to take into account different points of view. And from a German perspective, Poland is absolutely key in this.
Yes, Poland is crucial. In concrete terms, it is crucial that Poland does not stand in the way of Germany’s path to success. That is why Germany needs a docile government in Warsaw. One that will not regulate the Oder and expand the port in Świnoujście; who will not invest in the Central Communications Port and take over the billions of euros currently earned by German airports; which will not put pressure on increasing the presence of the United States in Europe and strengthen military ties with American companies or with Americans who work closely together (this is the case of South Korea); who will not defend the Polish currency and will do everything to join the eurozone. And the Germans already have such a government in Warsaw.
Now all that remains is to carry out an extensive operation to trap the Poles
It won’t be difficult. The time is right. Nearly 52 percent of Poles surveyed answering affirmatively to the question: “Do you support the methods used by the new government to take over the public media?”, the Germans can confidently think that for these fools on the Vistula River, every law, the rule of law, or principles are of no importance. Another thing is that this question is asked by a company of German origin, which itself welcomes these acquisitions, so that it does not bother the respondents with some evaluative adjective “illegal”.
READ MORE: Onet publishes a STUDY. It is said that the majority of Poles support Sienkiewicz’s methods. Let us remind you that we are talking about a brutal attack on the media!
The election results and the subsequent quiet (and sometimes very loud) acceptance of murderousness show that we are already a society quite well prepared for conquest – for the time being, economically, in terms of identity and even in terms of civilization. And the leading media market is almost closed.
Anyone who cares about what is good for Poland must understand that a crucial war for the future of our country has begun. And although the two-headed (external and internal) enemy has incomparably greater resources, it must be resisted.
Source: wPolityce