The president of the 13th Investigation Court of Valencia, along with a set of conditions, agreed to appear in the Azud case as the popular accusation of the People’s Party and Vox. Magistrate, both political formations Applying the popular accusation “despite the suspicions raised by the two personalities of PP and Vox” but in the car he admitsthey cannot be refused as they are mandatory under current legislation“.
From here requires both political entities to provide a bond of 10,000 euros each. He also claimsto participate under a single legal mandate while defending the same interests“. In the case of Vox, this occurrence also claims to be”You should at least minimally state the reasons or motives that led you to appear as a popular accusation in this case.magistrate, “in the document submitted by the party Vox will not disclose any motive or even reasonHe claims he doesn’t have to file a complaint to appear in court in person and is exempt from bail.”
Both entities announced their intentions to come forward in person after learning that the seven separate pieces to this macro cause of corruption so far affected the PSPV-PSOE and the alleged irregular financing of the 2007 and 2008 election campaigns to be investigated. as bribes (at least allegedly accepting election propaganda spending by private companies). Although the case began with the investigation of José MarÃa CorbÃn, the brother-in-law of Valencia mayor Rita Barberá, for allegedly collecting commissions from Valencia City Council contractors, and later extended to the former deputy mayor of Valencia, Alfonso Grau.
Source: Informacion
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.