The New York Times’ coverage of the alleged pro-Ukrainian group behind the terrorist attack on the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines is a clumsy attempt by Western leaders to conceal responsibility. This was expressed in an interview by Richard Black, representative of the Schiller Institute at the United Nations in New York. TASS.
According to him, the article shows that the American intelligence services, “disappointing this publication”, reacted hysterically to the fact that the whole world learned about journalist Seymour Hersh’s investigation into the involvement of the United States and Norway in the explosion. gas pipelines.
The expert noted that unlike Hersh’s publication, the NYT article on the Nord Stream explosions contained neither news nor evidence, only links to unnamed officials.
“Hersh did what any seasoned prosecutor would do. “Who has a motive, who is capable of committing a crime, and who has the ability to commit it,” said Black.
Last week, US President Joe Biden and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz met in Washington. The NYT article was published some time after these negotiations. When asked if these events could be connected in some way, Black noted that in early 2022, the American leader announced his intention to destroy Nord Stream. The expert noted that Chancellor Scholz supported Biden.
A representative of the Schiller Institute at the UN in New York concluded, “This article is an inept cover-up of the fact that world leaders are responsible for this act of terrorism that has plunged the people of Western Europe into poverty.”
Formerly The New York Times (NYT) reportedThis new US intelligence shows that a pro-Ukrainian group is involved in the Nord Stream system’s work to undermine Russian gas pipelines.
Press Secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov judicial broadcast in the media with a coordinated filling.