Consistency in actions and transparency of intentions are matters of honor in interpersonal agreements. Also when it comes to a social contract, which is based on a democratic electoral mandate. Any deviation from the contract is noticed immediately and has real consequences. Politicians should remember this.
More and more incomprehensible movements on the right side. Winking at the liberal-left electorate on issues with which PiS voters fundamentally disagree is a matter of grave concern. The added confusion caused by the President’s failure to negotiate important legal acts with the European Commission, which undermine the President’s powers and undermine his previous engagements with the European Commission, casts a powerful shadow on the “good change “. Especially when this operation is constantly undermined by false information about consultations with the president. Young ministers who venture into this story do not seem to understand the importance of the matter. Andrzej Duda has spoken out strongly enough on the bill on the Supreme Court recently tabled from Brussels. He called for constructive work on the law, stressed that he would not allow solutions that would introduce legal chaos and pointed to impassable negotiating limits. All the more incomprehensible are the statements that are repeated to this day, abolishing the possibility of making changes to the project before the Supreme Court. Today’s strong response from the President should ultimately prompt Prime Minister Morawiecki’s team into conscious reflection and make them realize that not only does the proposed “compromise” not have a parliamentary majority, but there is also an unequivocal disagreement between the President and Solidarna Poland.
READ MORE: The Chair takes the floor: Let me remind you that in February 2022 I prepared a draft that was favored by the European Commission. There was compromise and acceptance of KPO
Other “throw-ins” are also incomprehensible, especially to conservative voters. Because when issues of identity recede into the background, when the issues of external interference in internal systemic affairs are called tertiary issues, what really matters to the ruling camp? Energy, financial and military security are of course an extremely important axis of action. But it must not be forgotten that the greatest battle is in the field of civilization, it is about the ideology that impulsively breaks in, aimed at dismantling social structures, disarming identity and disarming the foundations of the state. Only a healthy society is capable of making rational decisions, including elections. To wink at an ideology is to invite it to irrepressible action in an instant. The statement “we are a party of tolerance” carries a very strong interpretative load. Because if politicians say it in an official speech, on the occasion of an unequivocal ideological manifestation during the most watched program of public television, financed from the state budget, then something must have slipped out of the framework of the social contract. This is not the kind of statement voters expect from Law and Justice. Sprinkled with an indifferent statement: “love is love”, “love is important” reinforces the absurdity of this situation. Because it is clear that the majority of those who vote for the United Right are indifferent as to who loves whom and what relationships they enter into. However, it is extremely important to her whether the state protects the family, the citizen and the social identity against the current of highly destructive ideologies, which is nothing but an anti-civilization revolution. The rainbow band received with enthusiasm is only a trace. Behind it lies a powerful danger capable of irreversibly disrupting the social order. Winking in that direction is pointless. He will let the disappointed voters leave, he will refrain from electoral decisions. Broad left, neo-left and liberals do the rest. AND after the conservatives lose the election, the riders of the revolution will intervene immediately, first with the church, the “intolerant school” and the “backward society”. So can you afford to be short-sighted? This year will decide absolutely everything. May it not be too late.
READ ALSO: Marzena Nykiel: The right wing needs unity to win. Also with the electorate. And that is why he cannot make certain mistakes
Source: wPolityce