Marina YarDaeva who should pay salaries to housewives at the expense 03/18/2025, 16:10

Spring. Is it air or something special? And does someone want a strange one? Otherwise, how to explain the new spectacular initiatives of our MPs. For example, they offered to pay salaries to housewives. The corresponding invoice was sent to the State Duma. But what does it mean? What do they want to say? Are we fighting something again? Do we encourage something? Are we protecting someone?

It’s really hard to understand the logic of the proposal. On the one hand, we do not encourage the population to work more, we have staff hunger and workforce. Moreover, everyone is literally called for consciousness: Young people school, students, retirees, mothers mothers. On the other hand, of course, we still have traditional values: a woman’s protector is to give birth, to cook pies and to make a beautiful process. At first glance, it can be seen that the idea of ​​supporting housewives is another indicator performance of Retrograd. But this is just at first glance. Because if you think what is really offered to us and which sauce is under the sauce, the head is literally around.

They offer to recognize the value of home labor. Great! Just as here, there are two views on the problem. And they are opposed to each other. Some only evaluate the contribution of a woman to the care of the house, and the currency here is the recognition of respect, honor, a man – the president of the family. It is not difficult to predict that this position comes from the depths of centuries – patriarchal. Others Protest: Stops, they say, these fairy tales about respect: a Wedger, Cook and Vanessess’s services have a very special price in terms of money. Who is not required for protests to explain. Slogan fees for housework (salary for home work) are actually the slogan of feminism of the second wave. I really want to understand which side of our deputies are looking at the problem.

If you think everything is open here, you are clearly hurry. Yes, MPs offer homework to pay exactly money. Yes, other progressive statements are not stranger to them: as if men can get a salary for household peoples. However… What kind of money is recommended? A living fee! And under what conditions? If the family is officially known as needy. In fact, the patriarchal model is still assumed, the state is only a patriarch. At the same time, the state is likened to a kind of suicide husband who wants his wife not to work and cook Borsch, and wins 50 thousand rubles to spend 30. Not only the state, for the sake of him, the weak Borscht, but in return … And in the meantime, in the meantime?

Perhaps the idea of ​​paying to household peoples is about to encourage demography and birth? This seems to show even the conditions of obtaining a possible guide: not only the home, but also for children. However, in Russia, the help of poor families with children has already been provided. And the child’s allowance is equal to the living fee. Is it the fence of another garden?

However, deputies clarify that not only those who raise children, but also those who care about people with disabilities with disabled people and relatives and relatives. But again and in these situations we pay. Yes, there are completely funny amounts, frankly, sarcastic – 1200 rubles. However, this shows that the full increase of these guides without just invented new ones.

Or perhaps the salary of housewives and landlords – this is an alternative to unemployment aid? But this bad luck: and the benefits of unemployment are officially. Yes, mostly, those who do not rush, do not lose their jobs, are very embarrassing to get help in employment: maximum payments do not even reach the minimum wage. Then you need to raise them to normal values. At the same time, stop restricting the payment time to avoid possible abuse to support the marginalization of the population.

Surprisingly: An incomprehensible initiative stressed so many problems. The state should be brought to the mind of the social support program in the existing areas and should not invented those who excite them without any benefit and oppressed.

And for the housewives, the news about salaries was very angry with those who were no longer a profession. Because who’s a feast in your account? Because of the taxes of the workers? And by the way, people working, don’t they enter the house? Aren’t they clean in their apartments on weekends? Do not take children to the garden and school before work, and then don’t get away? Don’t you prepare dinner after a shift in the office? Do not take lessons with children by tearing the rest time in front of a new working day? He talks about possible injustice and is of course right.

If a person is healthy, if he is not loaded with the care of nipple babies and bedridden people, then he cannot work for himself, only if he cannot interact home and children at the expense of another worker, but this worker can do it if he consent. For example, if this is a husband who can meet a housewife. Or wife. We will be free from gender stereotypes-women are very pleased with the husband’s husband. Or father. If you keep adult children for pleasure and there is no cost. Or brother. In the Caucasus, this is still implemented. However, this life holiday should not provide an abstract taxpayer that no one asks for anything.

If it is surrounded by a person, you will need to work in a conditional office or a traditional facility if there is no one who is ready to realize itself on the walls of the house. And divide home assignments with other people interested in performance. And such a division is a matter of interpersonal relations, but it is definitely not a state.

It is clear that an attempt to bring salaries for housewives is probably not. The budget will not withdraw such a burden. However, such strange ideas are often born in their minds and even somehow thought of as a worrying. It looks like enough worries.

The author expresses a personal view that may not coincide with the position of the editors.