“This is where the game is played,” he shouted when Captain Renault ordered Rick’s cage to be closed in Casablanca. Something similar is happening today or in our somewhat dramatic or populist politics. It was so obvious that PP would agree with VOX where needed, and it was socially accepted, just like the fact that PSOE would agree with anyone who needed their help. And not only did he agree, but he reformed the laws to suit the allies on sensitive issues, for no other reason than mutual support and weakening the State on very sensitive issues.
All parties chant like a mantra the multiple groups that form a left close to the cabinet of the Marx brothers and become involved in their troubles stemming from personal grudges or very determined and financially calculable ambitions. Although all of them prevail among many as future projects that will put an end to the current constitutional system. Likewise, from the right, these options are extreme, flotilla-terrorist, and when well analyzed simply a long, etc. is defined as. of your time
Broad qualifiers are often unresponsive to reality and less so in a globalized world where classical ideologies have seen a noticeable decline in favor of concepts of a rapidly evolving world that were difficult to adapt to those that prevailed until very recently. There are no pure liberal parties; all maintain more or less a social profile. There are no communist parties, but some see the measure of all goods in the State and imprecise or even unavoidable defects in the market.
Talking about the far-right or the far-left, then, is not socially perceived as an obstacle to supporting a particular party, because such terminologies are generally less extreme in understanding by voters. The new left wasn’t as scary a few years ago as it was shown in 2015 and 2019, and neither was VOX given what happened a month ago.
Citizens tend to vote based on experience, and the outcome of municipal and district elections, which they predict will be general elections this year, depends more on government management than on speeches that declare chaos. Andalusia and Madrid are a clear example of this not working.
Beyond the fact that the PSOE has largely abandoned social democracy by betting on the so-called zapaterismo, which Sánchez delves into, there is no denying that the coalition government has gone bad or wrong.
Although not shared, positive things were done. This is obvious. However, it cannot be denied that the conflicts within government between PSOE and UP and ultimately between UP and UP are not well received, as it is this image of stability that gives citizens confidence in who governs. their work, life and property were lost.
At the same time, some of Sánchez’s political decisions opened cracks in the most moderate PSOE voters themselves. It was one thing to grant amnesty to convicted separatists, who certainly contributed to peace and understanding in Catalonia. It was not received socially. Another quite different, however, was to partially decriminalize embezzlement, aggravated in 2015, to quell sedition without creating a new crime fit for nonviolent but illegal riots, and finally, to prosecute corruption more seriously. Maintaining relations with BİLDU was one thing, making it a more preferred partner than UP was another, while those convicted of terrorism offenses in the form of murder were on the lists. They served their sentences, of course, but at the same time, VOX’s number one for Valencia had to resign from all charges as he was convicted of violence against women ten years ago. It’s hard to explain, because obviously, killing his wife is more serious than psychologically abusing her.
Being independent is legal and ethical. Being a communist is an option. Or anarchist. Being on the right. And being from the radical right is just as valid as being from the most visible left. Sanitary cords resulting from restrictions not provided for by law are not possible or should not be possible, as it means restricting the freedom that belongs to everyone. And if extremes do occur, it will or should be the law, not the ideologies raised to dogma by those who share it and hate their opponents.
Respect, harmony and a return to dialogue are prerequisites for strengthening coexistence. Vote freely regardless of a certain vote, an example of maturity no matter what. I don’t understand that there are worse quality votes if you vote freely.
At 23J we decided whether to change the government or not. To do this, we will decide on the Spaniards, who are already old. Regardless, I don’t think there is room for chaos or hell in this world and right now. Chaos is not being able to vote freely. What is decided is and should be the result of the conscience of each.
Source: Informacion
Dolores Johnson is a voice of reason at “Social Bites”. As an opinion writer, she provides her readers with insightful commentary on the most pressing issues of the day. With her well-informed perspectives and clear writing style, Dolores helps readers navigate the complex world of news and politics, providing a balanced and thoughtful view on the most important topics of the moment.