Behind the unnecessarily vicious debate about transsexuality lies the miserable reality of a historical marginalization that has fortunately been mitigated by the already long era of democracy, but still has embers that must be extinguished. Because transsexuals, probably because of their inescapable visibility, have been the most severely harassed by intransigent people. Dramatically, her options were often limited to prostitution or suicide. Consequently, it is unreasonable to reduce the final clarification of their social integration to a political cause.
It should be noted from the outset that free gender self-determination is self-regulated in 15 of the 17 autonomous communities (exceptions are Asturias and Castilla y León, in addition to Ceuta and Melilla). Those who have completed the age of 16 have the right to take place in university and school titles with their names and genders, as per these regional regulations, and they will be registered with health centers and hospitals. In other words, they are recognized in all areas where regional governments are competent.
However, at the state level, everything is still extremely complicated, contrary to WHO rules. To change the mention of gender in the DNI, for example, according to the current legislation of 2007, only minors can request a registration change and for this they must provide a diagnosis of gender dysphoria – a disease for longer than no OME since 2018 and have undergone hormonal therapy for at least two years. Since 2019, when the Constitutional Court annulled the article of law limiting this opportunity to only minors, this scope has been expanded to include minors who are “sufficiently mature and in a stable transgender situation”. For those over 18 years old.
With the new and controversial law under preparation, it will then be possible to extend the right of gender self-determination to the state level in the 12- to 16-year-old division, with judicial approval and parental consent for 12- to 14-year-olds. 14 to 16 authorization. However, this is opposed by the psychiatry sector on the one hand and the feminism sector on the other.
Prestigious Dr. A group of psychiatrists led by Celso Arango opposes that minors’ right to self-determination can be done without mandatory advice. His explanation is as follows: “I am not against the minor to go and request a registration change. What I’m against is that you can do it without further knowledge and without knowing why. I treat young people with borderline personalities who can do this to one side and the other every month.” Therefore, in his view, it is necessary to “put a filter on the assessment by a mental health professional”.
Regarding a group of feminists from the PSOE and other parties, the negative position of Alianza Contra el Borrado de las Mujeres stems from the fact that “The government’s proposal allows you to change the data even if you are not transgender”. sex record. In this way, “sex becomes subjective and therefore irrelevant data in the registry. The subject to which the norm is directed should not be ‘every person’ as the current project calls it, but rather the person presenting medically accredited disputes about their gender”.
However, the inconsistency lies in the fact that some think that transsexuality should be compared by a legal expert to someone else who thinks it is a strictly personal matter. Common sense and common sense suggest that the problem can perhaps be addressed in stages: first this check will be necessary and then it can be eliminated if it turns out to be unnecessary. What is important is that the law persists and its recipients feel cared for and protected by the State.
Source: Informacion
Ben Stock is a business analyst and writer for “Social Bites”. He offers insightful articles on the latest business news and developments, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the business world.