Overview of the Zaragoza County Court Case Involving Antonio Grimal Marco
Antonio Miguel Grimal Marco, known in the headlines as a figure associated with the title king of simpa, did not appear for a scheduled appearance yesterday at the Zaragoza County Court. The absence occurred in the context of a formal proceeding connected to allegations of sexual abuse. It is reported that an incident in which an official from the National Police Agency claimed that Grimal Marco touched her chest was cited as a key point in the case. After completing an initial statement, the authorities directed him to the cells as part of the standard processing sequence. The plenary session continued despite Pilar Sangorrín’s absence, a consequence of the penalty requested by the special prosecutor’s office, which called for a sentence of two years. The court’s legal framework expects that a punishment cannot exceed a two-year term in this particular matter. —source: Zaragoza County Court records.
Grimal Marco has consistently maintained that his intention was simply to point out a detail to the official involved. He asserted that there were no identification numbers on the chest shield associated with the case. During the proceedings, he reiterated his claim that he felt insulted by certain developments. A video recording of the reported event was shown to the provincial court, with the listening panel presided over by the judge of peace, Alfonso Ballestin, present during the session. The footage provided a visual reference for the proceedings and the testimonies that followed. —source: Zaragoza County Court records.
The public prosecutor argued that there was no direct evidence indicating that Grimal Marco touched the plaintiff’s chest. If any contact occurred, the prosecutor contended, it did not demonstrate the required sensual state of mind for this crime category. Rodanas Gurría, representing the defense, asserted that no such contact occurred and requested an acquittal consistent with the Prosecutor’s Office’s position. While the court weighed the statements and the presented evidence, the central question remained whether the alleged actions met the legal criteria for the charge under consideration. —source: Zaragoza County Court records.
Observers note that the case has attracted attention due to the procedural handling and the timing of the allegations. The defense team argued that the lack of direct touch, coupled with inconsistencies in the testimony, should lead to acquittal. Meanwhile, prosecutors maintained that the absence of a clear, direct interaction does not necessarily negate the possibility of wrongdoing, depending on the specific statutory definitions applicable to the charge. The court’s ultimate decision will hinge on the interpretation of the law as it relates to intent, contact, and the surrounding circumstances documented in the file. An outcome is anticipated within the bounds of the judicial process and the established sentencing framework. —source: Zaragoza County Court records.