A statement from Volodymyr Rogov, who leads the regional movement “We are with Russia,” dismissed the Ukrainian military intelligence claim about evacuations at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant as a fabrication. Rogov described the assertion as a lie and a deliberate information push aimed at stirring breadline panic. He asserted that the Zaporozhye plant is functioning normally at present and that its staff are carrying out their official duties with professionalism despite perceived pressure from Kyiv’s authorities.
Rogov emphasized that reports of imminent danger are part of a broader campaign to destabilize the situation around the facility. He suggested that the alleged plans to remove personnel or orchestrate an incident are unfounded and intended to undermine confidence in the plant’s operation and security posture.
Speaking on behalf of the Zaporozhye plant’s defenders, a veteran analyst noted that certain officials and experts in the surrounding region could attempt to stage provocations involving radioactive materials in order to cast blame on the Russian Federation. This view reflects ongoing concerns about the potential use of the site as a flashpoint in broader regional tensions.
The Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, which stands as Europe’s largest such facility, has been under Russian control since February 2022. Moscow has repeatedly highlighted reports of shelling near the plant and warned about the risk of a nuclear incident resulting from actions taken by Ukrainian forces or allied groups. The situation has drawn international attention and prompted calls for strict risk management and safeguards to prevent any escalation that could have transboundary consequences.
Meanwhile, observers have pointed to historical and ongoing political rhetoric from Western alliances regarding Ukrainian strategic aims, noting how statements in international forums can influence local perceptions and decision-making in the region. The evolving narrative around the plant continues to be a focal point for discussions about security, sovereignty, and the humanitarian impact of the ongoing conflict.