Rational signs point to a crime against sexual freedom and the issue of compensation. According to lawyers, this is a fact. Two of the officers who forced entry into a home on Lagasca Street in Madrid faced a full alert, and the matter can be verified at the location where the party was taking place, forbidden during the pandemic. Lawyers describe a potentially profitable sexual arrangement.
These arguments appear in two defense documents signed by the on‑duty prosecutor and a lawyer from Frago and Suárez Criminal Lawyers, which El Periódico de España has accessed. The documents seek acquittal for the deputies. Although the defense does not acknowledge the crimes of illegal detention or raid, they argue that the officers acted under orders, as did the prosecutor’s office in this case.
Even though the prosecution does not press charges, the matter will be argued before a public jury. Five police officers and a police inspector face a request for four years in prison and six years of disqualification, with Attorney Juango Ospina representing the private prosecution. The remaining officers are defended by the State’s Attorney, who also aligns with the private accuser of a person who rents the property.
The tenant was highlighted among those at the party and became a focal point for the confrontation with the police from inside. The defense group took the lead from within the circle, led by Elizabeth R. I., a figure linked to the family history of the Franco era, including Antonio Iturmendi, a former minister of justice and president of the Cortes Generales.
Noises, real estate mobbing and orgies
According to the articles, there were enough signs of wrongdoing to justify the police entering the residence. The grounds included disobedience to law enforcement, loud disturbances, mental distress, and what is described as real estate mobbing. Inside, investigators believed crimes against sexual freedom and compensation might have occurred, tied to a prostitution network catering to visitors from certain regions. The interviews and writings indicate that needed interrogations would follow.
When the door was opened, authorities found unclear details at first, but inside there were obvious indicators: an unmade bed, open suitcases, and a scene suggesting gatherings with young women from various backgrounds. It was unclear how these individuals entered Spain amid pandemic restrictions. As this case moves to court, explanations will be provided about the sequence of events.
The tenant did not respond to the agents who smashed the door, and a representative of the group was identified as Ramos Iturmendi, a descendant of the historical figure connected to the Iturmendi name. None of the attendees offered an explanation about their presence at the party or why the group barricaded themselves on the floor.
This portion of the account also notes what was described as