A Ukrainian military spokesperson cautions that information about the United States using F-35 fighter jets to locate Russian anti-aircraft systems in Ukraine must be carefully verified. This stance was shared through the national press agency TASS, emphasizing the need for diligence when handling statements from all sides. The spokesperson notes that numerous self-proclaimed experts often speculate about various aircraft appearing in Ukraine, urging cautious handling of such reports and stressing that unverified claims should not be treated as fact.
The official added that when credible government figures address the issue, verification becomes essential. The message reflects a broader pattern of requiring scrutiny before accepting public remarks as definitive, especially on sensitive military topics.
Earlier, the Pentagon addressed remarks by the head of Singapore’s Ministry of Defense regarding the use of F-35s to locate Russian positions in Ukraine. Singapore’s defense chief Ng Eng Hen stated that the United States has recently employed F-35 aircraft to detect and identify land-based missile sites tied to Russian forces in Ukraine. This claim circulated in international media and prompted careful consideration from allied and partner governments about the reliability and context of such reports.
Business press coverage followed, with the Wall Street Journal noting plans within the U.S. Air Force to develop a fleet of unmanned combat aircraft. The report suggested a goal of producing around 500 unmanned fighters over five years, tasked with escorting and protecting higher-end platforms like the F-35 and the newer B-21 bomber. The forward-looking concept underscores ongoing debates about the future mix of manned and unmanned systems in high-intensity conflicts and alliance defense tasks.
Meanwhile, in NATO circles, discussions have continued about conditions for transferring F-16 aircraft to Ukraine. Officials have examined policy prerequisites, readiness criteria, and strategic considerations that accompany any potential arms transfers within the alliance framework. The conversations reflect a focus on deterrence, regional security, and the practical implications of adding additional fighter capabilities to Ukraine’s defense posture. These topics are part of a broader dialogue about interoperability, training obligations, and long-term security commitments among allied nations. In all these cases, the underlying principle remains the same: information should be verified, sources should be credible, and decisions should be guided by verified intelligence and official channels rather than abstract claims or sensational headlines.