In Uzbekistan, the acting president emerged from the latest presidential election with an overwhelming mandate, tallying eighty-seven point zero five percent of the votes as reported by the country’s Central Election Commission. This figure reflects preliminary data released by the commission, offering a first read on the electoral outcome and the distribution of votes across the major candidates. The rapid disclosure of results is a common practice in Uzbekistan, intended to provide the public with timely information on the electoral process and its conclusions.
Among the other contenders, the first deputy chairman of the Supreme Court, Robakhon Makhmudova representing the Social Democratic Party Adolat, secured four point four three percent of the vote. The leader of the People’s Democratic Party, Ulugbek Inoyatov, received four point zero two percent, while Abdushukur Khamzaev, heading the Ecology Party, obtained three point seven four percent. The spread among these candidates highlights a competitive field, though their shares were far from the lead.
Turnout figures released by the Central Election Commission show a voter participation rate of seventy-nine point eight percent. This level of engagement is interpreted by election observers as an indicator of public interest and confidence in the electoral process, although assessments vary across regions and demographic groups.
During a post-election briefing, Zainiddin Nizamkhodzhaev, serving as the president of the country’s CEC, stressed that the presidential elections were conducted in a manner that was open, transparent, and democratic. The tone of the remarks underscored the commission’s commitment to upholding procedural integrity and public trust in the electoral system, while also inviting scrutiny and verification from national observers.
On the evening of July 9, at 20:00 local time, with clocks showing 18:00 Moscow time, the commission announced that voting stations across Uzbekistan had closed and the presidential elections had concluded. The formal close of polls marks the transition from voting to tallying, and it triggers the next phase of official certification and public communication of the results.
Beyond the domestic focus on the electoral process, there were regional developments noted in the same period involving neighboring states Armenia and Azerbaijan. The dialogue referenced mutual recognition of territorial integrity, a topic tied to longstanding regional security and diplomacy concerns. This element underscores how regional dynamics can intersect with national electoral events, shaping the broader political landscape reported by observers and commentators in the period following the vote.