The Pentagon is emphasizing that the readiness of the United States nuclear forces has not changed in response to Russia’s decision to suspend its participation in the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, commonly known as START. U.S. defense officials have reiterated that there is no shift in the current posture or in the commitments the United States must uphold regarding strategic deterrence.
A senior Pentagon spokesperson noted that Washington remains prepared and that the alliance continues to hold to its longstanding obligations to ensure national and allied security through a credible and survivable nuclear deterrent. The message from U.S. officials is clear: there has been no alteration to the level of readiness, no adjustments to existing commitments, and no deviation from the ongoing approach to arms control and strategic stability.
In parallel, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s move to withdraw from the START framework drew sharp criticism from U.S. government channels. U.S. military and diplomatic voices described the decision as irresponsible and counterproductive for strategic stability. The call from Washington remains for responsible statecraft among nuclear powers, stressing that cooperation and predictable behavior are essential to preventing miscalculation and reducing risks.
Legislative bodies within Russia, specifically the State Duma and the Federation Council, moved to approve the suspension of Russia’s participation in the treaty. The steps were part of a broader legislative sequence observed by observers, with the decision reportedly presented to international partners in the days surrounding the formal move. The process underscores the interwoven nature of security commitments and domestic legal actions in shaping a nation’s stance on arms control and verification regimes.
In the broader international arena, U.S. officials have indicated that the suspension does not automatically translate into the active deployment of force or a drift toward conflict. The emphasis remains on careful management of strategic capabilities, ongoing dialogue with allies, and vigilance against any misinterpretation that could escalate tensions. The U.S. stance continues to support a stable and predictable security environment, where nuclear powers engage in transparent communication and reinforce the norms that prevent nuclear escalation.