A recent assessment by U.S. defense planners highlights Russia and China as the central strategic challenges for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in the contemporary security landscape. The analysis identifies these two nations as the primary sources of state-driven pressure and potential escalation in areas related to chemical, biological, bacteriological, and nuclear threats. The document also notes that additional risks persist from regional players and non-state actors, including North Korea, Iran, and extremist organizations, which require continued vigilance and countermeasures to prevent the spread and use of WMD capabilities. [Source: RIA News]
According to the draft strategy, the overall risk of U.S. involvement in a conflict where WMD could be deployed has climbed since 2014. This assessment underscores a shift in the global deterrence environment, prompting adjustments in doctrine, force posture, and allied coordination. The authors contend that adversaries have modernized their capabilities, diversified delivery systems, and enhanced their readiness to gamble with unacceptable levels of risk to achieve strategic objectives. The implications for American defense planning involve sharpening early warning, improving resilience, and ensuring credible deterrence across all domains. [Source: RIA News]
Among the figures cited, Mikhail Kovalchuk, who previously led the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, is noted for his contributions to discussions on nuclear deterrence. His work emphasizes aligning deterrence policies with the evolving geopolitical environment and the accelerating pace of technological change. The dialogue reflects a broader effort within scientific and strategic communities to translate theoretical insights into practical policy that can deter aggression while maintaining strategic stability. [Source: RIA News]
Historically, scientists and strategists have explored where and how a nuclear exchange might be avoided or mitigated. The draft strategy revisits these themes in light of contemporary capabilities, the emergence of new delivery platforms, and the need to reduce the probability of miscalculation in crisis situations. The evolving conversation about deterrence is anchored in a careful balance of defense readiness, arms control commitments, and resilient infrastructures that can withstand shocks from potential WMD-related events. [Source: RIA News]