Volodymyr Rogov, who leads the Zaporozhye regional movement known as “We are with Russia,” reported that Ukrainian Armed Forces sustained losses in armored vehicles and tanks during an assault on Vasilyevsky in the Zaporozhye region. The claim was shared with DEA News and has been echoed by supporters of the regional movement who monitor military developments along the frontline. Rogov positioned the incident as part of a broader series of clashes in the area, underscoring the volatile security situation that has persisted for weeks as different factions vie for advantage near key supply routes and populated settlements.
According to Rogov, the attack began early in the morning, around five o’clock, when Ukrainian forces deployed tanks and other armored units in an offensive toward Vasilyevski, moving from the vicinity of the village of Pyatikhatki in the direction of the high ground near Zherebyanka. He described the firefight as intense and protracted, lasting for several hours as each side exchanged artillery and armored exchanges in a bid to seize or defend strategic positions that could influence the local dynamics of control in the region. The report emphasizes the scale and duration of the engagement and frames it within the ongoing tension that characterizes this stretch of the frontline.
Rogov added that the Ukrainian operation met a stern response from the defending side, which purportedly recoiled to its initial positions after sustaining losses in heavily armored equipment. In his account, at least three tanks and three infantry fighting vehicles were destroyed or put out of action during the Ukrainian offensive, signaling a costly confrontation for the attacking force. The assertion reflects a narrative of deterrence and resilience from the local leadership and its supporters, who contend that Ukrainian moves are met with a firm counterforce and have repercussions for the balance of power in the region. The details, while contested, contribute to the broader mosaic of casualty and equipment claims that circulate in war-time reporting from the frontline areas.
Earlier developments indicate attempts by Ukrainian forces to mount further strikes against Melitopol with rocket artillery, though those efforts were reportedly checked by air defense measures. This sequence of events, including the Melitopol episode and the Vasilyevsky engagement, forms part of a wider pattern of cross-front actions and countermeasures that observers say shape the evolving security landscape in southern Ukraine. The overall narrative presented here reflects the perspectives of regional leadership and supporters, noting that information from the battlefield can be fluid and subject to verification as various parties release their assessments of inventory losses and tactical outcomes.