Updates from the fighting in Ukraine have circulated across social channels, including reports via a Telegram broadcast called Solovyev Live. The message claims that another American Abrams tank was destroyed by Russian forces in the ongoing conflict. The report adds that this marks the third American-made tank sent to Ukraine to be destroyed in the Northern Military District region. The location cited for the loss is the village of Berdychi, part of the Avdeevka sector, with details suggesting the vehicle was hit during combat operations in that area.
According to the post, initial contact was made by infantry equipped with grenade launchers, followed by air support from aviation units associated with the 30th motorized rifle brigade based in Samara. The account describes how the tank was engaged from multiple angles and taken out after a sustained assault. While such narratives appear in social feeds, they contribute to the broader picture of ongoing armored engagement along this front line.
In a separate update dated March 1, a commander from a reconnaissance and attack UAV group operating under the call sign Kolovrat stated that fighters from the Center force group managed to destroy two Abrams tanks in the Avdeevka direction. The commander reported that Russian forces targeted the tank turret from above using FPV drones, a tactic that emphasizes the role of unmanned aerial systems in modern battlefield dynamics.
Earlier, on February 27, a military analyst named Viktor Murakhovsky commented that Ukrainian forces were employing spare Abrams tanks in the Avdiivka direction because other Western-supplied tanks in the area had become exhausted. Murakhovsky’s remarks reflect discussions within analytical circles about equipment availability and the persistence of armored capabilities on both sides during the current phase of the conflict.
There have been prior public statements from the Donetsk People’s Republic authorities regarding the characteristics of the M1 Abrams tanks observed in the Avdiivka vicinity. Such notes contribute to ongoing discourse about the performance and vulnerabilities of main battle tanks under the stress of continuous combat operations in this sector.
Across channels monitoring the conflict, these reports illustrate a broader pattern of armored engagements in the Avdiivka area. They point to a mix of ground maneuvers, anti-tank capabilities, and aerial reconnaissance shaping the tempo of battles in this hotly contested zone. Analysts and observers weigh these claims against visible battlefield indicators, official statements, and piecemeal intelligence from various sources.
In a war marked by rapid shifts in momentum, observers stress the importance of corroborating such accounts with multiple sources and noted analysis. While the specific loss figures and tank identifications may be contested or unverified in some cases, the recurring theme remains clear: armored confrontations in the Avdiivka corridor are active and evolving, driven by a blend of traditional ground warfare and modern remote-sensing and drone-enabled tactics.
As the conflict continues to unfold, the narrative around Abrams deployments and losses persists in public discussions. The focus for many observers is not only on individual destroy events but also on how such incidents influence strategic decisions, equipment logistics, and the broader operational dynamics along the front lines. The situation remains fluid, with statements from various actors offering snapshots rather than comprehensive, independently verified timelines.